Citation notice #1361 · 2026-07-11 03:18:55.000788+00:00

Generative AI Use in Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and an Empowerment-Entrapment Framework

cites 2025, Societies, 15, 6, doi: 10.3390/soc15010006, which carries a correction notice dated 2025-09-10. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 9

https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 Gindert, M., & Müller, M. L. (2024). The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Ideation and the Performance of Innovation Teams (Preprint) (Version 4). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV .2410.18357 Glickman, M., & Sharot, T. (2025). How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2 Glikson, E., & Asscher, O. (2023). AI-mediated apology in a multilingual work context: Implications for perceived authenticity and willingness to forgive. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107592 51 Graham, L. (2024, April 25). Sam Altman’s “one-person unicorn” and the future of the office. Medium. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 Guo, Y . G., Liu, F. F., Li, N., & Lu, J. G. (2026). AI vs. Human Counselors: Who Provides Better Psychological Well-Being Support? A Longitudinal Experiment. Gupta, S., & Ranjan, R. (2024). Evaluation of LLMs Biases Towards Elite Universities: A Persona-Based Exploration

02Event

Type

Correction

Source

Crossref

Original DOI

10.3390/soc15010006

Notice DOI

10.3390/soc15090252

Date

2025-09-10

Title

Correction: Gerlich, M. AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies 2025, 15, 6

Reasons

['Correction']

Work

2025, Societies, 15, 6, doi: 10.3390/soc15010006 (2025) Societies

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.