Pith. sign in

Reference change · event page

Reference changes · DOI

2025, Societies, 15, 6, doi: 10.3390/soc15010006

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 13 open · 13 total · 0 disputed
DOI
10.3390/soc15010006
Notice DOI
10.3390/soc15090252
Event date
2025-09-10
Machine twin
JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open
Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task

ref [3] · 2506.08872 · notice #1362 · dispute

Raw extraction · citation context

robust cognitive skills is paramount. The integration of LLMs into learning environments presents a complex duality: while they enhance accessibility and personalization of education, they may inadvertently contribute to cognitive atrophy through excessive reliance on AI-driven solutions [3]. Prior research points out that there is a strong negative correlation between AI tool usage and critical thinking skills, with younger users exhibiting higher dependence on AI tools and consequently lower cognitive performance scores [3]. Furthermore, the impact extends beyond academic settings into broader cognitive development.

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

robust cognitive skills is paramount. The integration of LLMs into learning environments presents a complex duality: while they enhance accessibility and personalization of education, they may inadvertently contribute to cognitive atrophy through excessive reliance on AI-driven solutions [3]. Prior research points out that there is a strong negative correlation between AI tool usage and critical thinking skills, with younger users exhibiting higher dependence on AI tools and consequently lower cognitive performance scores [3]. Furthermore, the impact extends beyond academic settings into broader cognitive development

Correction Open
Generative AI Use in Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and an Empowerment-Entrapment Framework

ref [9] · 2604.02567 · notice #1361 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 Gindert, M., & Müller, M. L. (2024). The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Ideation and the Performance of Innovation Teams (Preprint) (Version 4). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV .2410.18357 Glickman, M., & Sharot, T. (2025). How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2 Glikson, E., & Asscher, O. (2023). AI-mediated apology in a multilingual work context: Implications for perceived authenticity and willingness to forgive. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107592 51 Graham, L. (2024, April 25). Sam Altman’s “one-person unicorn” and the future of the office. Medium. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 Guo, Y . G., Liu, F. F., Li, N., & Lu, J. G. (2026). AI vs. Human Counselors: Who Provides Better Psychological Well-Being Support? A Longitudinal Experiment. Gupta, S., & Ranjan, R. (2024). Evaluation of LLMs Biases Towards Elite Universities: A Persona-Based Exploration
Correction Open
Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans

ref [19] · 2605.05353 · notice #1357 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

author Gerlich, M. , year 2025 b. title AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking . journal Societies volume 15 , pages 6 . :10.3390/soc15010006

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

author Gerlich, M., year 2025 b. title AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking . journal Societies volume 15, pages 6 . :10.3390/soc15010006

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.