Citation notice #7035 · 2026-07-11 06:31:24.924964+00:00

Security and Privacy in Virtual and Robotic Assistive Systems: A Comparative Framework

cites Comput- ers &; Security134, 103448 (2023), which carries a correction notice dated 2023-05-08. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Cited paper on Pith Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · citation context · bibliography index 43

Another major concern is unauthorized access to stored voice data and inter- action logs [65]. Because these systems continuously collect and transmit audio data to remote servers, they introduce substantial risks of data leakage and pri- vacy violations. Attackers may exploit weaknesses in communication protocols, cloud storage, or authentication mechanisms to access sensitive information [43]. 4 Elsayed et al. Replay attacks are also a common threat, where previously recorded voice commands are used to trigger system actions without user consent [52]. Many systems lack robust speaker verification or contextual validation, making it dif- ficult to distinguish legitimate commands from malicious ones [5]. These vulner- abilities highlight the need for stronger authentication, encryption, and privacy-

02Event

Type

Correction

Source

Crossref

Original DOI

10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103448

Notice DOI

10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103468

Date

2023-05-08

Title

Corrigendum to “Modified replica exchange-based MCMC algorithm for estimation of structural reliability based on particle splitting method” [Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 72 (2023) 103448]

Reasons

['Erratum']

Work

Comput- ers &; Security134, 103448 (2023) (2023)

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.