arxiv: 2603.29907 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-31 · 💻 cs.CR

Recognition: no theorem link

Security and Privacy in Virtual and Robotic Assistive Systems: A Comparative Framework

Nelly Elsayed

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 23:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR

keywords securityprivacyassistive systemsthreat modelingvirtual systemsrobotic systemscyber-physical risks

0 comments

The pith

A unified comparative threat-modeling framework structures analysis of attack surfaces, risk profiles, and safety implications for virtual and robotic assistive systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified comparative threat-modeling framework to examine security and privacy challenges in assistive technologies that support older adults, people with disabilities, and those needing ongoing care. Virtual systems are shown to face risks centered on data privacy, unauthorized access, and adversarial voice manipulation, while robotic systems add sensor spoofing, perception manipulation, command injection, and physical safety hazards. The framework organizes these into a common structure for comparing attack surfaces and risk profiles across both categories. A sympathetic reader would care because these systems promote independence and safety, making their protection essential for user trust. The work concludes with design recommendations for secure and privacy-preserving implementations.

Core claim

We present a comparative analysis of security and privacy challenges across virtual and robotic assistive systems. We develop a unified comparative threat-modeling framework that enables structured analysis of attack surfaces, risk profiles, and safety implications across both systems. Moreover, we provide design recommendations for developing secure, privacy-preserving, and trustworthy assistive technologies.

What carries the argument

The unified comparative threat-modeling framework, which organizes attack surfaces, risk profiles, and safety implications into a shared structure for virtual and robotic assistive systems.

Load-bearing premise

The listed risks for virtual systems and robotic systems represent the primary and sufficiently distinct threats without major unaddressed overlaps or additional vectors.

What would settle it

Identification of a major attack vector that affects both system types yet cannot be placed into any category of the proposed unified framework would show the model is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.29907 by Nelly Elsayed.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The comparative architecture of virtual and robotic assistive systems and their attack surfaces. expose vulnerabilities related to data privacy, cloud communication, and user authentication. However, robotic systems introduce further vulnerabilities in cyber-physical interactions. These vulnerabilities include sensor spoofing, perception manipulation, and unsafe actuation. Understanding these architectura… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Threat model for virtual and robotic assistive systems. voice recordings, behavioral patterns, environmental observations, and interaction histories. System functionality must remain reliable to ensure correct interpretation of user commands and environmental inputs [35]. Communication channels are also critical, as both virtual and robotic systems rely on network connectivity to exchange data among sens… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Assistive technologies increasingly support independence, accessibility, and safety for older adults, people with disabilities, and individuals requiring continuous care. Two major categories are virtual assistive systems and robotic assistive systems operating in physical environments. Although both offer significant benefits, they introduce important security and privacy risks due to their reliance on artificial intelligence, network connectivity, and sensor-based perception. Virtual systems are primarily exposed to threats involving data privacy, unauthorized access, and adversarial voice manipulation. In contrast, robotic systems introduce additional cyber-physical risks such as sensor spoofing, perception manipulation, command injection, and physical safety hazards. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of security and privacy challenges across these systems. We develop a unified comparative threat-modeling framework that enables structured analysis of attack surfaces, risk profiles, and safety implications across both systems. Moreover, we provide design recommendations for developing secure, privacy-preserving, and trustworthy assistive technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper compares security risks across virtual and robotic assistive systems but the claimed unified framework reduces to separate risk lists without shared structure or validation.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper pulls together the security differences between virtual assistive systems (data privacy, unauthorized access, voice manipulation) and robotic ones (sensor spoofing, command injection, physical hazards) and tries to treat them under one comparative lens. It does a solid job flagging why these matter for technologies aimed at older adults and people with disabilities, and the design recommendations at the end are practical and tied directly to the listed threats. That part is useful as an overview for anyone entering the area of cybersecurity for human-centered systems. The work extends standard threat modeling rather than inventing new methods, which is fine for a comparative piece. The soft spot is the framework itself. The abstract promises a unified approach for analyzing attack surfaces and risk profiles, but the content stays at high-level enumerations for each system type with only passing notes on overlaps. There is no common taxonomy, notation for cross-system mapping, quantitative metrics, or worked examples that would let someone apply it to a new device. This makes the central claim hard to evaluate and limits how much the paper moves the field forward. The citation pattern looks standard and draws from relevant AI and IoT security sources without obvious gaps. This is the kind of paper that could work for a reading group focused on assistive tech security, where the discussion would center on what a stronger comparative method would actually require. It deserves peer review because the topic is relevant and the basic distinctions hold up, even though the framework needs concrete development to be usable.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a comparative analysis of security and privacy risks in virtual assistive systems (data privacy, unauthorized access, adversarial voice manipulation) and robotic assistive systems (sensor spoofing, perception manipulation, command injection, physical safety hazards). It claims to develop a unified comparative threat-modeling framework enabling structured analysis of attack surfaces, risk profiles, and safety implications across both, along with design recommendations for secure and privacy-preserving assistive technologies.

Significance. If a repeatable unifying model with shared taxonomy, notation, and cross-system mappings were supplied, the work could aid systematic threat analysis in assistive technologies and highlight hybrid cyber-physical risks. As presented, the contribution is limited to separate high-level risk enumerations without an operational framework, reducing significance to a survey-style overview rather than a methodological advance.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim of developing a 'unified comparative threat-modeling framework' is not supported; the text supplies no common taxonomy, shared attack-surface notation, quantitative risk metric, or repeatable analysis method that would enable systematic comparison beyond the listed items.
[Framework section] Framework section: The analysis reduces to independent enumerations of virtual risks and robotic risks with only passing mention of overlaps (e.g., voice-command injection); no cross-system mapping or integration into a single model is defined, undermining the central claim of structured comparative analysis.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by briefly outlining the framework's key components (e.g., taxonomy or mapping procedure) to preview how the comparison is performed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our comparative analysis. We address each major point below and commit to revisions that strengthen the manuscript's contribution without altering its core claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of developing a 'unified comparative threat-modeling framework' is not supported; the text supplies no common taxonomy, shared attack-surface notation, quantitative risk metric, or repeatable analysis method that would enable systematic comparison beyond the listed items.

Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract's phrasing may imply a more formalized model than is explicitly detailed. The paper structures the analysis around consistent categories (privacy, access control, manipulation, and safety) applied to both system types, but we agree a clearer taxonomy and notation would better substantiate the framework claim. We will revise the abstract to describe a 'comparative threat-modeling approach' and add an explicit taxonomy subsection with shared notation for attack surfaces. revision: yes
Referee: [Framework section] Framework section: The analysis reduces to independent enumerations of virtual risks and robotic risks with only passing mention of overlaps (e.g., voice-command injection); no cross-system mapping or integration into a single model is defined, undermining the central claim of structured comparative analysis.

Authors: The manuscript aligns risks under shared dimensions (e.g., data exposure, command integrity, physical/cyber safety) to enable comparison, with overlaps such as voice interfaces noted as bridging elements. However, we accept that dedicated cross-system mappings are insufficiently explicit. In revision, we will add a unified mapping table and integration diagram that consolidates attack surfaces and risk profiles into a single comparative structure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; framework is a descriptive enumeration of risks without self-referential derivation

full rationale

The paper claims to develop a unified comparative threat-modeling framework enabling structured analysis of attack surfaces and risk profiles. The content consists of separate enumerations of virtual-system risks (data privacy, unauthorized access, adversarial voice manipulation) and robotic-system risks (sensor spoofing, perception manipulation, command injection, physical hazards) plus high-level design recommendations. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, self-citations as load-bearing premises, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorems are present. The central claim does not reduce to its inputs by construction; the analysis is self-contained as a side-by-side categorization of described threats.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The framework rests on standard domain assumptions from cybersecurity threat modeling.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions in threat modeling such as the existence of adversaries with defined capabilities and access to network or sensor interfaces.
The comparative analysis relies on these background security assumptions to identify attack surfaces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5445 in / 1052 out tokens · 47660 ms · 2026-05-13T23:28:36.050488+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

[1]

Applied Computing and Informatics 20(1-2), 119–141 (2024)

Abba Ari, A.A., Ngangmo, O.K., Titouna, C., Thiare, O., Kolyang, Mohamadou, A., Gueroui, A.M.: Enabling privacy and security in cloud of things: Architecture, applications, security & privacy challenges. Applied Computing and Informatics 20(1-2), 119–141 (2024)

work page 2024
[2]

In: Cyber Security for Next-Generation Computing Technologies, pp

Abou El Houda, Z.: Cyber threat actors review: examining the tactics and motiva- tions of adversaries in the cyber landscape. In: Cyber Security for Next-Generation Computing Technologies, pp. 84–101. CRC Press (2024)

work page 2024
[3]

Journal of Field Robotics43(1), 5–33 (2025)

Adesiji, A.D., Ibitoye, S.E., Mahamood, R.M., Olayemi, O.A., Omoniyi, P.O., Jen, T., Akinlabi, E.T.: Safety considerations in deployment of robotic sys- tems – a systematic review. Journal of Field Robotics43(1), 5–33 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rob.70022

work page doi:10.1002/rob.70022 2025
[4]

IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2026)

Adil, M., Ali, A., Abulkasim, H., Farouk, A., Song, H., Jin, Z.: Internet of audio things, future vision, open challenges, and research opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2026)

work page 2026
[5]

International Journal of Speech Technology28(3), 615–638 (2025)

Al-Karawi, K.A., Abdelwahab, M.M., Alenizi, A.S.: Comprehensive review of auto- matic speaker verification with spoofing detection techniques attacks. International Journal of Speech Technology28(3), 615–638 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

Journal of Systems and Software p

Amiri, Z., Taghavirashidizadeh, A., Khorrami, P.: Ai-driven decision-making in healthcare information systems: a comprehensive review. Journal of Systems and Software p. 112470 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9694-0.ch014, http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/979- 8-3693-9694-0.ch014

Anand, S., Miglani, S., Anand, R.: Ai-driven assistive technologies: Cloud infrastructure for enhanced accessibility and inclusion (2025). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9694-0.ch014, http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/979- 8-3693-9694-0.ch014

work page doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9694-0.ch014 2025
[8]

In: 2021 IEEE 11th Annual Com- puting and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC)

Anniappa, D., Kim, Y.: Security and privacy issues with vir- tual private voice assistants. In: 2021 IEEE 11th Annual Com- puting and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC). p. 0702–0708. IEEE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ccwc51732.2021.9375964, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCWC51732.2021.9375964

work page doi:10.1109/ccwc51732.2021.9375964 2021
[9]

Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 15 Smart Environments14(6), 455–481 (2022)

Avenoğlu, B., Koeman, V.J., Hindriks, K.V.: A cloud-based middleware for multi- modal interaction services and applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 15 Smart Environments14(6), 455–481 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3233/ais-220161, http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/AIS-220161

work page doi:10.3233/ais-220161 2022
[10]

In: 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Sys- tems

Baeg, S.H., Park, J.H., Koh, J., Park, K.W., Baeg, M.H.: Building a smart home environment for service robots based on rfid and sensor net- works. In: 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Sys- tems. p. 1078–1082. IEEE (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccas.2007.4407059, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2007.4407059

work page doi:10.1109/iccas.2007.4407059 2007
[11]

The Service Industries Journal41(13–14), 860–876 (2020)

Belk, R.: Ethical issues in service robotics and artifi- cial intelligence. The Service Industries Journal41(13–14), 860–876 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1727892, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1727892

work page doi:10.1080/02642069.2020.1727892 2020
[12]

EURASIP Journal on Information Security2025(1), 1 (2025)

Bhardwaj, A., Bharany, S., Rehman, A.U., Tejani, G.G., Hussen, S.: Securing cyber-physical robotic systems for enhanced data security and real-time threat mitigation. EURASIP Journal on Information Security2025(1), 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[13]

Hello me, meet the real me: Audio deepfake attacks on voice assistants.arXiv preprintarXiv:2302.10328, 2023

Bilika, D., Michopoulou, N., Alepis, E., Patsakis, C.: Hello me, meet the real me: Audio deepfake attacks on voice assistants (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2302.10328, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10328

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.10328 2023
[14]

Sensors21(7), 2312 (2021)

Bolton, T., Dargahi, T., Belguith, S., Al-Rakhami, M.S., Sodhro, A.H.: On the security and privacy challenges of virtual assistants. Sensors21(7), 2312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072312, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072312

work page doi:10.3390/s21072312 2021
[15]

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.543862

Borg, J., Larsson, S., Östergren, P.: The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disability & Society26(2), 151–167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.543862

work page doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.543862 2011
[16]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04248 (2017)

Brendel, W., Rauber, J., Bethge, M.: Decision-based adversarial attacks: Re- liable attacks against black-box machine learning models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04248 (2017)

work page arXiv 2017
[17]

Sensors21(6), 2212 (2021)

Brunete, A., Gambao, E., Hernando, M., Cedazo, R.: Smart assistive architecture for the integration of iot devices, robotic systems, and multimodal interfaces in healthcare environments. Sensors21(6), 2212 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

In: 2019 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP)

Castro-Antonio, M.K., Carmona-Arroyo, G., Herrera-Luna, I., Marin- Hernandez, A., Rios-Figueroa, H.V., Rechy-Ramirez, E.J.: An approach based on a robotics operation system for the implementation of inte- grated intelligent house services system. In: 2019 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP). p. 182–186. IEEE...

work page doi:10.1109/conielecomp.2019.8673166 2019
[19]

IEEE Access6, 36662–36682 (2018)

Chen, W., Yaguchi, Y., Naruse, K., Watanobe, Y., Nakamura, K., Ogawa, J.: A study of robotic cooperation in cloud robotics: Architecture and challenges. IEEE Access6, 36662–36682 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2852295, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2852295

work page doi:10.1109/access.2018.2852295 2018
[20]

Proceedings of the IEEE110(4), 476–507 (2022)

Cheng, P., Roedig, U.: Personal voice assistant security and privacy—a survey. Proceedings of the IEEE110(4), 476–507 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2022.3153167, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2022.3153167

work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3153167 2022
[21]

Chimuco, F.T., Sequeiros, J.B., Lopes, C.G., Simões, T.M., Freire, M.M., Inacio, P.R.:Securecloud-basedmobileapps:attacktaxonomy,requirements,mechanisms, testsandautomation.InternationalJournalofInformationSecurity22(4),833–867 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

In: 2017 IEEE conference on cognitive and computational aspects of situation management (CogSIMA)

Clark, G.W., Doran, M.V., Andel, T.R.: Cybersecurity issues in robotics. In: 2017 IEEE conference on cognitive and computational aspects of situation management (CogSIMA). pp. 1–5. IEEE (2017) 16 Elsayed et al

work page 2017
[23]

Ethical theory and moral practice13(2), 181–190 (2010)

Coeckelbergh, M.: Health care, capabilities, and ai assistive technologies. Ethical theory and moral practice13(2), 181–190 (2010)

work page 2010
[24]

Journal of Neu- roEngineering and Rehabilitation9(1), 20 (2012)

Cowan, R.E., Fregly, B.J., Boninger, M.L., Chan, L., Rodgers, M.M., Reinkens- meyer, D.J.: Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. Journal of Neu- roEngineering and Rehabilitation9(1), 20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743- 0003-9-20, http://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-0003- 9-20

work page doi:10.1186/1743- 2012
[25]

Sensors22(21), 8531 (2022)

De Freitas, M.P., Piai, V.A., Farias, R.H., Fernandes, A.M., de Moraes Rossetto, A.G., Leithardt, V.R.Q.: Artificial intelligence of things applied to assistive tech- nology: a systematic literature review. Sensors22(21), 8531 (2022)

work page 2022
[26]

In: 2022 IEEE 8th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF- IoT)

Elsayed, N., ElSayed, Z., Asadizanjani, N., Ozer, M., Abdelgawad, A., Bayoumi, M.: Speech emotion recognition using supervised deep recurrent system for mental health monitoring. In: 2022 IEEE 8th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF- IoT). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

In: Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC) (2014)

Georgoulas, C., Raza, A., Güttler, J., Linner, T., Bock, T.: Home environment interaction via service robots and the leap motion controller. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC) (2014)

work page 2014
[28]

Journal of Computer Science Research5(2), 28–36 (2023)

Giachos, I., Papakitsos, E.C., Savvidis, P., Laskaris, N.: Inquiring natural language processing capabilities on robotic systems through virtual assistants: A systemic approach. Journal of Computer Science Research5(2), 28–36 (2023)

work page 2023
[29]

Security and Commu- nication Networks4(11), 1295–1307 (2011)

Giannetsos, T., Dimitriou, T., Prasad, N.R.: People-centric sensing in as- sistive healthcare: Privacy challenges and directions. Security and Commu- nication Networks4(11), 1295–1307 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.313, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sec.313

work page doi:10.1002/sec.313 2011
[30]

In: Healthcare

Giansanti, D., Pirrera, A.: Integrating ai and assistive technologies in healthcare: Insights from a narrative review of reviews. In: Healthcare. vol. 13, p. 556. MDPI (2025)

work page 2025
[31]

Robotics and Autonomous Systems 60(6), 889–900 (2012)

González Alonso, I., Álvarez Fres, O., Alonso Fernández, A., del Torno, P.G., Maestre, J., Almudena García Fuente, M.: Towards a new open communication standard between homes and service robots, the dhcompliant case. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 60(6), 889–900 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2012.01.006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2012.01.006

work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2012.01.006 2012
[32]

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction14, 1 – 23 (2024), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:272044712

Grabler, R., Koeszegi, S.T.: Privacy beyond data: Assessment and mitigation of privacy risks in robotic technology for elderly care. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction14, 1 – 23 (2024), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:272044712

work page 2024
[33]

Robotics and Autonomous Sys- tems99, 75–83 (2018)

Guerrero-Higueras, A.M., DeCastro-Garcia, N., Matellan, V.: De- tection of cyber-attacks to indoor real time localization sys- tems for autonomous robots. Robotics and Autonomous Sys- tems99, 75–83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.10.006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.10.006

work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2017.10.006 2018
[34]

Robotics and Autonomous Systems 94, 43–52 (2017)

Guiochet, J., Machin, M., Waeselynck, H.: Safety-critical ad- vanced robots: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 94, 43–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.004 2017
[35]

In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGAC- CESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Hamidi, F., Poneres, K., Massey, A., Hurst, A.: Who should have access to my pointing data?: Privacy tradeoffs of adaptive assistive Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 17 technologies. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGAC- CESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. p. 203–216. AS- SETS ’18, ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/323...

work page doi:10.1145/3234695.3239331 2018
[36]

ACM Computing Surveys57(9), 1–48 (2025)

Haskard, A., Herath, D.: Secure robotics: Navigating challenges at the nexus of safety, trust, and cybersecurity in cyber-physical systems. ACM Computing Surveys57(9), 1–48 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1145/3723050, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3723050

work page doi:10.1145/3723050 2025
[37]

IEEE Network26(3), 21–28 (2012)

Hu,G.,Tay,W.,Wen,Y.:Cloudrobotics:architecture,challengesandapplications. IEEE Network26(3), 21–28 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2012.6201212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2012.6201212

work page doi:10.1109/mnet.2012.6201212 2012
[38]

https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2508.16843, https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16843

Kamel, K., Sood, K., Dutta, H.S., Aryal, S.: A survey of threats against voice authentication and anti-spoofing systems (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2508.16843, https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16843

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.16843 2025
[39]

DIGI- TAL HEALTH11(2025)

Kchaou, M., Munusamy, Y., Alharthi, K.A., Al-mahmodi, A.F.: In- dustry 5.0 adaptation for disability-inclusive healthcare: A review of emergent and ai technologies for assistive digital health. DIGI- TAL HEALTH11(2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251395558, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076251395558

work page doi:10.1177/20552076251395558 2025
[40]

Computers in Industry97, 132–145 (2018)

Khalid, A., Kirisci, P., Khan, Z.H., Ghrairi, Z., Thoben, K.D., Pannek, J.: Security framework for industrial collaborative robotic cyber-physical systems. Computers in Industry97, 132–145 (2018)

work page 2018
[41]

Sensors19(23), 5238 (2019)

Krausz, N.E., Hargrove, L.J.: A survey of teleceptive sensing for wearable assistive robotic devices. Sensors19(23), 5238 (2019)

work page 2019
[42]

IEEE Internet of Things Journal7(6), 5103– 5115 (2020)

Li, J., Liu, Y., Chen, T., Xiao, Z., Li, Z., Wang, J.: Adversarial attacks and defenses on cyber–physical systems: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal7(6), 5103– 5115 (2020)

work page 2020
[43]

Comput- ers &; Security134, 103448 (2023)

Li, J., Chen, C., Rahimi Azghadi, M., Ghodosi, H., Pan, L., Zhang, J.: Secu- rity and privacy problems in voice assistant applications: A survey. Comput- ers &; Security134, 103448 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103448, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103448

work page doi:10.1016/j.cose.2023.103448 2023
[44]

IEEE Internet of ThingsJournal7(9),8025–8035(2020).https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.2997779, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997779

Mao, J., Zhu, S., Dai, X., Lin, Q., Liu, J.: Watchdog: Detecting ultrasonic- based inaudible voice attacks to smart home systems. IEEE Internet of ThingsJournal7(9),8025–8035(2020).https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.2997779, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997779

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2997779 2020
[45]

Maqsood, M., Yasmin, S., Gillani, S., Aadil, F., Mehmood, I., Rho, S., Yeo, S.S.: An autonomous decision-making framework for gait recognition systems against adversarialattackusingreinforcementlearning.ISAtransactions132,80–93(2023)

work page 2023
[46]

Applied Sciences12(4), 2174 (2022)

Marchang,J.,DiNuovo,A.:Assistivemultimodalroboticsystem(amrsys):security and privacy issues, challenges, and possible solutions. Applied Sciences12(4), 2174 (2022)

work page 2022
[47]

In: ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

Marsh, A., Milne, S.: I don’t want to sound rude, but it’s none of their business: Ex- ploringsecurityandprivacyconcernsaroundassistivetechnologyuseineducational settings. In: ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3670690

work page doi:10.1145/3670690 2024
[48]

Micheletto, M., Setzu, A., Tronci, M., Trudu, M., Marcialis, G.L.: Deep- fake voice command attacks on automatic speaker recognition systems, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:283562207

work page
[49]

Assistive Technology and Artificial Intelligence: Applications in Robotics, User Interfaces and Natural Language Pro- cessing pp

Miller, D.P.: Assistive robotics: an overview. Assistive Technology and Artificial Intelligence: Applications in Robotics, User Interfaces and Natural Language Pro- cessing pp. 126–136 (2006) 18 Elsayed et al

work page 2006
[50]

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Tech- nology17(6), 605–623 (2020)

Modi, N., Singh, J.: A survey of research trends in assistive technologies using information modelling techniques. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Tech- nology17(6), 605–623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1817992, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1817992

work page doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1817992 2020
[51]

Computer Vision and Image Understanding149, 78–97 (2016)

Mollaret, C., Mekonnen, A.A., Lerasle, F., Ferrané, I., Pinquier, J., Boudet, B., Rumeau, P.: A multi-modal perception based assistive robotic system for the el- derly. Computer Vision and Image Understanding149, 78–97 (2016)

work page 2016
[52]

In: International Symposium on End User Development

Monge Roffarello, A., De Russis, L.: Defining trigger-action rules via voice: a novel approach for end-user development in the iot. In: International Symposium on End User Development. pp. 65–83. Springer (2023)

work page 2023
[53]

EAI Endorsed Trans

Mulfari, D., Celesti, A., Fazio, M., Villari, M., Puliafito, A., et al.: Achieving as- sistive technology systems based on iot devices in cloud computing. EAI Endorsed Trans. Cloud Syst.1(1), e4 (2015)

work page 2015
[54]

IEEE Access 12, 22072–22097 (2024)

Neupane, S., Mitra, S., Fernandez, I.A., Saha, S., Mittal, S., Chen, J., Pillai, N., Rahimi, S.: Security considerations in ai-robotics: A sur- vey of current methods, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access 12, 22072–22097 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3363657, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3363657

work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3363657 2024
[55]

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technol- ogy138(9–10), 3925–3942 (2025)

Omiyale, B.O., Odeyemi, J., Ogbeyemi, A., Olorunsogbon, F., Zhang, W.C.: Im- pact of cyber physical systems on enhancing robotic system autonomy: a brief critical review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technol- ogy138(9–10), 3925–3942 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15828-w, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15828-w

work page doi:10.1007/s00170-025-15828-w 2025
[56]

Computers11(12), 181 (2022)

Oruma, S.O., Sánchez-Gordón, M., Colomo-Palacios, R., Gkioulos, V., Hansen, J.K.: A systematic review on social robots in public spaces: Threat landscape and attack surface. Computers11(12), 181 (2022)

work page 2022
[57]

In: 2020 International Confer- ence on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)

Ozer, M., Varlioglu, S., Gonen, B., Adewopo, V., Elsayed, N., Zengin, S.: Cloud incident response: Challenges and opportunities. In: 2020 International Confer- ence on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). pp. 49–54. IEEE (2020)

work page 2020
[58]

Elsevier, United States, 6 edn

Polgar, J., Encarnação, P., Smith, E., Cook, A.: Assistive technologies: principles and practice. Elsevier, United States, 6 edn. (Jan 2025)

work page 2025
[59]

Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems107(1), 12 (2023)

Ringwald, M., Theben, P., Gerlinger, K., Hedrich, A., Klein, B.: How should your assistive robot look like? a scoping review on embodiment for assistive robots. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems107(1), 12 (2023)

work page 2023
[60]

In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual In- ternational Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services

Roy, N., Hassanieh, H., Roy Choudhury, R.: Backdoor: Making micro- phones hear inaudible sounds. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual In- ternational Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. p. 2–14. MobiSys’17, ACM (Jun 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3081333.3081366, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3081333.3081366

work page doi:10.1145/3081333.3081366 2017
[61]

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)48(3), 1–38 (2016)

Sgandurra, D., Lupu, E.: Evolution of attacks, threat models, and solutions for virtualized systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)48(3), 1–38 (2016)

work page 2016
[62]

IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory &; Applications10(1) (2025)

Shaik, A.K., Mohammadi, A., Malik, H.: A systematic review of sen- sor vulnerabilities and cyber-physical threats in industrial robotic sys- tems. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory &; Applications10(1) (2025). https://doi.org/10.1049/cps2.70023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cps2.70023

work page doi:10.1049/cps2.70023 2025
[63]

IEEE Ac- cess5, 4621–4635 (2017)

Sharma, S.K., Wang, X.: Live data analytics with collaborative edge and cloud processing in wireless iot networks. IEEE Ac- cess5, 4621–4635 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2682640, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2682640 Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 19

work page doi:10.1109/access.2017.2682640 2017
[64]

Singhal, K., Sabharwal, P., Sharma, D.K., Kuntala, C., Sristi, Ghosh, U.: Sensing and communication mechanisms for advanced robotics and complex cyber-physical systems (Nov 2023)

work page 2023
[65]

International Journal of Global Innova- tions and Solutions (IJGIS) (2024)

Tabbassum, A., Bhattacharya, S.: A comprehensive review of privacy risks in voice-activated virtual assistants. International Journal of Global Innova- tions and Solutions (IJGIS) (2024). https://doi.org/10.21428/e90189c8.2b69e04c, http://dx.doi.org/10.21428/e90189c8.2b69e04c

work page doi:10.21428/e90189c8.2b69e04c 2024
[66]

The journal of supercomputing76(12), 9493–9532 (2020)

Tabrizchi, H., Kuchaki Rafsanjani, M.: A survey on security challenges in cloud computing: issues, threats, and solutions. The journal of supercomputing76(12), 9493–9532 (2020)

work page 2020
[67]

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering25(12), 120809 (2025)

Thakur, A., Kaipa, K., Banerjee, A.G., Cappelleri, D.J., Krovi, V.N., Gupta, S.: Physical artificial intelligence for powering the next revolution in robotics. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering25(12), 120809 (2025)

work page 2025
[68]

In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Vasic, M., Billard, A.: Safety issues in human-robot interactions. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. p. 197–204. IEEE (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2013.6630576, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630576

work page doi:10.1109/icra.2013.6630576 2013
[69]

In: 2013 ieee international conference on robotics and automation

Vasic, M., Billard, A.: Safety issues in human-robot interactions. In: 2013 ieee international conference on robotics and automation. pp. 197–204. IEEE (2013)

work page 2013
[70]

Applied Sciences12(8), 3929 (2022)

Villalón-Huerta, A., Ripoll-Ripoll, I., Marco-Gisbert, H.: A taxonomy for threat actors’ delivery techniques. Applied Sciences12(8), 3929 (2022)

work page 2022
[71]

https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.06010, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06010

Wang, Y., Yan, Q., Ivanov, N., Chen, X.: A practical survey on emerg- ing threats from ai-driven voice attacks: How vulnerable are commer- cial voice control systems? (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.06010, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06010

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.06010 2023
[72]

Journal of Advanced Nursing81(6), 2885–2912 (2025)

Wang, Y., Sun, H., Xu, S., Xia, Q., Ge, S., Li, M., Tang, X.: Smart home technolo- gies for enhancing independence of living and reducing care dependence in older adults: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing81(6), 2885–2912 (2025)

work page 2025
[73]

International Journal of Information Security21(1), 115–158 (2021)

Yaacoub, J.P.A., Noura, H.N., Salman, O., Chehab, A.: Robotics cy- ber security: vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommenda- tions. International Journal of Information Security21(1), 115–158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-021-00545-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10207- 021-00545-8

work page doi:10.1007/s10207-021-00545-8 2021
[74]

ACM Computing Surveys55(4), 1–36 (2022)

Yan, C., Ji, X., Wang, K., Jiang, Q., Jin, Z., Xu, W.: A survey on voice assistant se- curity: Attacks and countermeasures. ACM Computing Surveys55(4), 1–36 (2022)

work page 2022
[75]

In: 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)

Zhang, N., Mi, X., Feng, X., Wang, X., Tian, Y., Qian, F.: Dangerous skills: Un- derstanding and mitigating security risks of voice-controlled third-party functions on virtual personal assistant systems. In: 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). p. 1381–1396. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2019.00016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SP.2019.00016

work page doi:10.1109/sp.2019.00016 2019