Citation notice #8898 · 2026-08-07 06:19:18.710000+00:00

Recency effect disappears when information is integrated from independent perceptual sources

Correction Crossref Open

cites D” in repose to U or R directions, and “Z, which carries a correction notice dated 2012-03-28. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 12

Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012b). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Figure Legends Figure 1. Direction discrimination task with single - and double-pulse random dot motions. In single-pulse trials, the motion was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R) and six coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%, 25.6%, 51.2%) , and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec). In double-pulse trials, the first motion pulse was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R), and three coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec); the second pulse was randomly selected from U and R if the first pulse was U or R, and from D or L if the first pulse was D or L. The coherence of the second pulse was always different from that of the first pulse; either weaker or stronger. In both trial types, participants were instructed to press “D” in repose to U or R

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012b). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Figure Legends Figure 1. Direction discrimination task with single - and double-pulse random dot motions. In single-pulse trials, the motion was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R) and six coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%, 25.6%, 51.2%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec). In double-pulse trials, the first motion pulse was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R), and three coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec); the second pulse was randomly selected from U and R if the first pulse was U or R, and from D or L if the first pulse was D or L. The coherence of the second pulse was always different from that of the first pulse; either weaker or stronger. In both trial types, participants were instructed to press “D” in repose to U or R

02Event

Type: Correction
Source: Crossref
Original DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1120118109
Notice DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204601109
Date: 2012-03-28
Title: Correction for Wyart et al., Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity
Reasons: ['Correction']
Work: D” in repose to U or R directions, and “Z (2012)

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.