D” in repose to U or R directions, and “Z

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012b). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Figure Legends Figure 1. Direction discrimination task with single - and double-pulse random dot motions. In single-pulse trials, the motion was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R) and six coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%, 25.6%, 51.2%) , and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec). In double-pulse trials, the first motion pulse was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R), and three coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec); the second pulse was randomly selected from U and R if the first pulse was U or R, and from D or L if the first pulse was D or L. The coherence of the second pulse was always different from that of the first pulse; either weaker or stronger. In both trial types, participants were instructed to press “D” in repose to U or R

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012b). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Figure Legends Figure 1. Direction discrimination task with single - and double-pulse random dot motions. In single-pulse trials, the motion was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R) and six coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%, 25.6%, 51.2%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec). In double-pulse trials, the first motion pulse was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R), and three coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec); the second pulse was randomly selected from U and R if the first pulse was U or R, and from D or L if the first pulse was D or L. The coherence of the second pulse was always different from that of the first pulse; either weaker or stronger. In both trial types, participants were instructed to press “D” in repose to U or R