Pith. sign in

Citation notice #9179 · 2026-08-07 18:18:06.627209+00:00

Overlooked weak structural connections support human cognition under nonlinear connectome scaling

Correction Crossref Open

cites Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees, which carries a correction notice dated 2019-04-29. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.

This is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Citing paper Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes

01Evidence

Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 10

Ardesch DJ, Scholtens LH , Li L, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, van den Heuvel MP. Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(14):7101-7106. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.1818512116

Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)

Ardesch DJ, Scholtens LH, Li L, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, van den Heuvel MP. Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(14):7101-7106. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.1818512116

02Event

Type
Correction
Source
Crossref
Original DOI
10.1073/pnas.1818512116
Notice DOI
10.1073/pnas.1906107116
Date
2019-04-29
Title
Correction for Ardesch et al., Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees
Reasons
['Correction']
Work
Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees (2019) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Schema constants (for re-runners): correction · crossref

03Dispute this notice

If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.