Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 89 references

Overlooked weak structural connections support human cognition under nonlinear connectome scaling

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The brain's weakest structural connections, routinely discarded as noise, carry reproducible cognitive signal once their small weights are nonlinearly amplified by a global exponent β < 1.

desk verdict Serious empirical case that weak structural edges carry individual-difference signal, but the mechanism (beta<1 nonlinear amplification) is a fitted phenomenological model, not an established biological law. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24125 v3 pith:V35BOZRU submitted 2025-05-30 q-bio.NC

Rong Wang , Zhao Chang , Xuechun Liu , Daniel Kristanto , Étienne Gérard Guy Gartner , Xinyang Liu , Mianxin Liu , Ying Wu
show 2 more authors
Ming Lui Changsong Zhou
This is my paper
classification q-bio.NC
keywords weakstructuralconnectivitytractographynonlinearscalingcognitiveabilitypredictionfunctionalsimulationstructure-functioncouplinggeneco-expressionconnectomefiltering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Most network-neuroscience pipelines threshold away the weakest structural connections between brain regions, treating them as tractography noise. This paper argues the opposite: weak connections in the human connectome carry real, reproducible individual-difference signal, but only when their small weights are interpreted nonlinearly. Applying the transformation $w_{ij} \to w_{ij}^{\beta}$ with $\beta < 1$ improves prediction of general cognitive ability and memory, improves dynamic-model simulation of functional connectivity, and strengthens structure\textendash function coupling across multiple datasets and tractography pipelines. The authors also fuse two tractography filtering methods\textemdash commitment's mask with SIFT2's weights\textemdash to produce a connectome that keeps weak links while suppressing false positives, and they identify a specific class of weak links (visual/motor to limbic, with negative gene co-expression) that has an outsized functional impact.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the uniform power-law scaling $w_{ij} \to w_{ij}^{\beta}$, applied to every tractography-derived connection weight, with $\beta < 1$ compressing the orders-of-magnitude dynamic range of streamline counts so that weak links gain functional weight relative to strong ones; choosing $\beta$ by nested cross-validation (for cognition), by a $c$\textendash$\beta$ grid search (for FC simulation), or by empirical SC\textendash FC correlation is the test that yields the paper's effects. The second piece is the fused connectome, defined as commit2's binary mask of which links are kept, combined with SIFT2's continuous streamline weights for those links; this fusion is what lets the authors remove false-positive-prone weak links while retaining the weak links that carry individual-difference signal.

What would settle it

Measure anatomical fiber counts with a ground-truth technique (e.g., viral tract tracing in a macaque or marmoset) together with evoked responses in the downstream region, and check whether the relationship between anatomical weight and functional influence is described by a single global exponent $\beta<1$; if the best-fit $\beta$ equals 1.0, or varies strongly across region pairs, the uniform nonlinear scaling claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that weak structural connectivity is functionally significant in a nonlinear manner: applying the transformation $w_{ij} \to w_{ij}^{\beta}$ with $0 < \beta < 1$ to tractography-derived connection weights amplifies the relative contribution of weak links and, on this basis, weak links make measurable contributions to cognitive prediction, functional-connectivity simulation, and structure\textendash function coupling. In a nested cross-validation on 999 participants from a public young-adult dataset, the best predictions of general cognitive ability and memory occur at $\beta \approx 0.70$ and $\beta \approx 0.60$, significantly above the linear $\beta = 1$ baseline, while crystallized intelligence is insensitive to $\beta$. The same nonlinear scaling improves whole-brain dynamic-model fits of resting-state functional connectivity (best $\beta \approx 0.18$) and empirical SC\textendash FC coupling (best $\beta \approx 0.32$). The authors further show that a fused connectome\textemdash commit2's binary mask (which removes likely false positives) combined with SIFT2's continuous weights\textemdash preserves weak links better than conventional thresholding, and that weak links organized along systems-level and transcriptomic gradients, especially those linking visual/motor with limbic regions under negative gene co-expression, exert a disproportionate influence on brain dynamics and cognitive predictions.

Load-bearing premise

The argument collapses if a single global exponent $\beta<1$, applied uniformly to all connection weights, does not actually represent how neural signal transmission amplifies weak links\textemdash if the true nonlinearity is region-specific or distance-dependent, the power law is just a fitting device and the weak-connection story is not directly supported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thresholding weak links out of tractography connectomes\textemdash still standard practice in many network-neuroscience pipelines\textemdash discards individual-difference information that predicts general cognitive ability and memory.
  • Whole-brain dynamic models that feed streamline counts in linearly ($\beta = 1$) understate weak links' role; scaling the structural input by $\beta<1$ yields simulated functional connectivity closer to empirical resting-state FC.
  • The fused SC (SIFT2 weights on commit2 masks) offers a threshold-free way to build a more reliable connectome that preserves weak links, applicable to other diffusion-MRI datasets.
  • Weak links connecting hub regions and links between resting-state networks are the ones whose rewiring degrades prediction, so the spatial placement of weak links, not only their weights, carries cognitive signal.
  • Positive- versus negative-gene-coexpression weak links have distinct functional impacts, so weak connectivity should not be treated as one homogeneous category in future connectome analyses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An independent, preregistered replication that fixes $\beta$ at the HCP-derived values (about 0.7 for general ability, 0.6 for memory, 0.2 for FC simulation) and applies them to a new cohort would separate the scaling effect from per-dataset overfitting; the nested designs reduce but do not eliminate that worry.
  • If $\beta$ is a real biological parameter, it should be measurable directly: invasive tract tracing plus electrophysiology in animal models, or laminar/effective-connectivity analyses that do not rely on diffusion MRI, could estimate $\beta$ independently of the data used here.
  • The negative-gene-coexpression weak links running between visual/motor and limbic regions resemble candidate feedback projections; directionality-aware models (laminar or Granger-style) could test the paper's 'forward vs backward' speculation, which undirected diffusion data cannot resolve.
  • Existing connectome-based clinical prediction studies built on thresholded graphs may be systematically underpowered; re-running them with $\beta<1$ scaling could uncover effects previously dismissed as noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that weak structural connections in diffusion-MRI tractography, whose weights are orders of magnitude smaller than strong connections, contribute to cognition and brain dynamics when the connectivity matrix is transformed as w_ij^beta with beta<1. Using HCP (n=999), UCLA (n=122), and a test-retest sample (n=44), the authors apply this scaling in a connectome-based prediction model of four latent cognitive abilities, in a linear whole-brain dynamical model of functional connectivity (FC), in SC-FC coupling analyses, and in a deep-learning SC-from-FC prediction. They also introduce a 'fused' SC that combines the commit2 mask with sift2 weights and report that it preserves weak links, outperforms conventional thresholding, and supports a segregation-integration balance. The paper concludes that weak connectivity is nonlinearly amplified, is organized by systems-level and transcriptomic gradients, and contains a functionally important subset with negative gene co-expression linking visual/motor and limbic regions.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the work would be valuable: it challenges a widespread thresholding practice, offers a practical fused connectome, and includes genuine methodological strengths such as nested cross-validation for beta selection in the CPM, an independent fMRI-session split for the dynamic model, noise-injection controls, replication across multiple tractography pipelines and datasets, and a public code link. The rewiring analyses and the selective improvements for general ability and memory are concrete, falsifiable observations. However, the mechanistic conclusion that beta<1 reflects biological amplification of weak fibers is not currently supported; the evidence is equally compatible with any monotone concave reweighting of a heavy-tailed matrix, and at least one analysis (SC-FC coupling) optimizes beta on the same outcome used for evaluation. The paper's practical and statistical findings are still worth publishing after revision, provided the interpretation is scaled back and the remaining validity concerns are addressed.

major comments (6)
  1. [§2.4, Fig. 4B] The SC-FC coupling analysis selects beta by maximizing the Pearson correlation between SC^beta and empirical FC and then reports this maximum (beta=0.319) as evidence that beta<1 improves structure-function coupling. No inner/outer validation is described for this step, so the reported optimum is guaranteed to be at least as large as the value at beta=1 even under the null. Please state explicitly which analyses have nested beta selection and which do not, and either add an out-of-sample procedure for this analysis or remove the causal-sounding interpretation.
  2. [§2.4 and §3.1, Eqs. (3)-(5)] The interpretation of beta<1 as 'nonlinear amplification of weak connectivity' is underdetermined. In the dynamical model, any monotone concave transform of a positively skewed weight matrix compresses the dynamic range, changes the spectral conditioning of (I-cW^beta)^-1, and will generally alter FC distances, independent of whether weak fibers carry specific signal. Consistent with this, the authors' own robustness analyses with log(SC+1) (Figs. S5, S20) produce similar results. To support the mechanistic reading, the manuscript needs an independent estimate of beta (e.g., from tract-tracing data), a pre-specified beta tested on a different cohort, or a model comparison that penalizes the transform family rather than selecting the best transform in-sample. Section 3.1 already concedes the lack of direct experimental evidence; the main text should state this limitation at the point of the headline claim.
  3. [Figs. 2D and 4A-C] The optimal beta differs substantially across analyses: 0.703/0.602 for general ability and memory in the CPM, 0.181 for FC simulation, 0.319 for SC-FC coupling, and 0.44 for deep-learning SC prediction. If these are estimates of a single biological amplification exponent, they are not reconciled; if they are per-analysis tuning parameters, then the phrase 'the nonlinear functioning manner' implies a unified mechanism that the data do not establish. Please either test for consistency across analyses or explicitly describe beta as a model-specific nuisance parameter.
  4. [§2.2, Fig. 2D] The CPM significance comparisons (e.g., t(99)=7.344 for general ability) treat 100 outer splits from 10 repetitions of 10-fold cross-validation as independent. Because the same 999 subjects reappear in test folds across repeats, the effective sample size is much smaller than 100 and the reported p-values are anti-conservative. Please re-analyze with subject-level aggregation, a mixed-effects model, or block bootstrap by subject, and report effect sizes and confidence intervals accordingly.
  5. [Figs. 3B and 4G-H] The comparison between fused and thresholded SC does not isolate the role of weak edges. Thresholding to the same density keeps the strongest sift2 edges, whereas the fused network keeps the commit2 mask edges, so the two networks differ in which edges are retained, not only in whether weak edges are included. The better SC-FC coupling and FC simulation of the fused network could reflect the particular edge set selected by commit2 rather than weak-edge preservation per se. A stronger test would be to add back only the preserved weak edges of the fused network to the thresholded network, or to vary the edge set while controlling the numbers of weak and strong edges.
  6. [§2.3, Fig. 3] The choice of lambda=0.05 for the fused SC appears to be made on the same HCP data subsequently used to demonstrate the benefits of the fused SC (Figs. 3B, 4F-H). No nested or external validation of lambda is reported. Since the fused connectome is a central product of the paper, the selection of lambda should be pre-specified, validated on an independent dataset, or shown to be insensitive to the evaluation criterion in a way that does not require peeking at the test results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The notation for the global connectivity term is malformed: 'c (1/L ∑ x_i^β L 1)' should be c·(1/L)Σ_{i=1}^L x_i^β. Please correct the equation and define L before use.
  2. [Fig. 2C caption] The caption states that the best predictions are significantly increased for general cognitive ability, memory, and crystallized intelligence, but the text reports best beta=0.973 (95% CI includes 1) for crystallized intelligence and says this ability is not sensitive to the nonlinearity. Please reconcile the caption with the main-text result.
  3. [§2.3, first paragraph] The phrase 'simple size n=44' contains a typo; it should read 'sample size n=44.'
  4. [Abstract and Discussion] The terms 'groundbreaking evidence' and 'newly discovered mechanism' are stronger than the evidence supports; please temper the language to match the phenomenological nature of the model and the acknowledged lack of direct experimental evidence.
  5. [§5.4, large-scale model] The AIC/BIC comparison between the fitted-beta model and the beta=1 model should state how the extra parameter beta enters the penalty; otherwise the claim that the improvement is not due to model complexity is not fully documented.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central claim that β<1 demonstrates amplified weak-edge function is partly definitional, and the SC-FC coupling result compares an in-sample argmax β against the fixed baseline β=1.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.4, Figure 4B (SC-FC coupling)]
    "Then, we focused on the brain structure-function relationship measured by Pearson correlation between empirical SC scaled by β and FC in each individual. The best SC-FC correlation in empirical data appears at β = 0.319 (95% CI, 0.315-0.322), which is significantly larger than that for β = 1.0 (t(998) = 151.300, p < 0.001, Figure 4B)."

    The reported β=0.319 is the value that maximizes corr(FC, W^β) by construction, while β=1.0 is a fixed baseline. Comparing this in-sample maximum against β=1.0 with a paired t-test does not test whether weak connectivity carries independent signal; a monotone family of concave transforms will almost always have some β<1 that improves the optimized correlation, even if weak edges carry no specific information. No held-out or nested selection of β is used for this SC-FC coupling analysis, so the 'significant' improvement is an artifact of choosing the best β and then using the same data to evaluate it.

  2. self definitional [Introduction and Section 2.2 (definition of β and interpretation of results)]
    "we proposed a phenomenological model to validate this potential nonlinear functioning manner by applying a scaling parameter β to all connectivity from tractography (i.e., 𝑤𝑖𝑗𝛽): β = 1.0 means that the streamline number is taken as the fiber strength... and 0.0<β<1.0 indicates the potential nonlinear dependence of fiber strength and functional effects on streamline numbers."

    The paper defines the hypothesis in terms of the same parameter that is then fitted and reported as evidence: β<1 is said to mean that weak connections are nonlinearly amplified, and the finding that the fitted β is below 1 is presented as demonstrating that weak connections matter. This is not an independent test of the mechanism—it is an interpretation of the estimated parameter. Any concave transform (including log(SC+1), which the paper notes gives similar results) will compress the heavy-tailed weight distribution and can produce β<1-like effects without specifically isolating weak fibers, so the observed improvement is built into the chosen functional form rather than derived from biological evidence.

full rationale

The paper contains several honest, nested cross-validation designs: the CPM selects β inside the training folds and evaluates on untouched test data, and the dynamic model uses split-half fMRI sessions. These parts are not circular. However, the central mechanistic claim—that β<1 proves weak structural connections are nonlinearly amplified—is tied by definition to the fitted parameter, and the SC-FC coupling analysis (Figure 4B) is an unambiguous in-sample argmax: β is optimized on the same data used for the significance test, so the reported improvement over β=1 is expected from the optimization procedure itself. The paper's own Discussion concedes that 'our theory is limited by the lack of direct experimental evidence,' reinforcing that the β-based results are phenomenological fits rather than independent confirmations. Taken together, at least one load-bearing 'prediction' reduces to a fitted parameter, but several independent analyses with proper held-out evaluation remain, so the paper is only partially circular rather than fully reducible to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper's core empirical claim requires the free beta exponent, the global coupling c, the definition of weak links, the active-size threshold and the mode-alignment procedure. The uniform nonlinear scaling is the single most important assumption, since all three independent-looking results (CPM, FC model, SC-FC coupling) are optimizations over that same parameter. The gene-coexpression and structural-mode results add further assumptions from prior work.

free parameters (8)
  • beta exponent for cognitive prediction = 0.703 (g), 0.602 (mem), 0.973 (cry), 95% CI reported
    Selected inside the inner CV loop to maximize prediction correlation; the paper's key 'nonlinearity' evidence is that the fitted beta is below 1.
  • beta exponent for dynamic model FC simulation = 0.181 (95% CI 0.178-0.183)
    One of two free parameters (c and beta) tuned to minimize distance between simulated and empirical FC; the reported beta<1 is fitted, not independently derived.
  • beta exponent for SC-FC coupling = 0.319 (95% CI 0.315-0.322)
    Chosen to maximize the Pearson correlation between scaled SC and empirical FC, i.e. fitted to the same data it supports.
  • beta exponent for deep-learning SC-from-FC prediction = 0.44 (95% CI 0.32-0.54)
    Selected via an inner loop on the training set to maximize correlation between predicted and true SC; also fitted.
  • global coupling c in dynamic model = optimal value per individual (not reported numerically in main text)
    Standard model parameter tuned to match empirical FC; a necessary fitting parameter.
  • commit2 lambda = 0.05 (studied over 0.01-0.2)
    Chosen from a trade-off between density, prediction and reliability; a hand-selected analysis parameter, although the choice is motivated by results.
  • threshold for defining weak connectivity = approximately 10% density
    A pragmatic definition; the paper explicitly says 'weak' is a relative definition with no accepted standard.
  • active-size threshold in eigenmode analysis = 1 SD of v_j across modes
    Used to define active sizes in structural modes; arbitrary but explicit.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Tractography streamline counts are a noisy but meaningful proxy for underlying fiber strength and carry genuine individual differences.
    The entire paper relies on this, and the authors acknowledge tractography has false positives and that streamline number does not strictly equal fiber strength (intro, refs. 3-6, Methods).
  • ad hoc to paper A single global power-law scaling w^beta (or log(SC+1)) of the structure matrix is an adequate representation of the nonlinear signal-transmission properties of the brain.
    The 'phenomenological model' is introduced in the introduction and Methods without independent constraint.
  • domain assumption The linear Gaussian or linear covariance model with c as global coupling adequately describes resting-state FC.
    Eqs. (3)-(4) use a linear model; the paper cites Nozari et al. 2024 that linear models are competitive, but this remains a modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Gene co-expression profiles averaged across donors and mirrored hemispheres reflect biologically meaningful transcriptomic relationships of the 360 cortical regions.
    AHBA data are post-mortem, sparse, and averaged, with interpolation for missing regions; the paper uses the abagen default pipeline.
  • domain assumption The nested spectral partition statistic HB measures the true segregation-integration balance of a brain network.
    HB is taken from the authors' own prior paper (Ref. 38), so the metric is inherited rather than independently validated here.
  • domain assumption The SEM factor structure of the four cognitive abilities is valid for this population.
    The measurement model is estimated and fits well (CFI=0.974, RMSEA=0.048), but its validity is assumed for downstream predictions.
  • domain assumption Eigenvectors of the SC Laplacian can be stably aligned across thresholded and full networks with the Kuhn-Munkres assignment.
    The authors explicitly state this 'does not guarantee the best alignment between two modes' in the Methods, yet the eigenmode-based claims rely on aligned mode sizes.
invented entities (2)
  • Fused SC connectome (commit2 mask + sift2 weights) independent evidence
    purpose: A more reliable connectome that retains weak links while reducing false-positive connectivity.
    Falsifiable via test-retest ICC (reported higher for fused than commit2) and via downstream prediction and FC simulation; also a practical recipe that others can apply.
  • Two types of weak connectivity defined by positive vs negative gene co-expression
    purpose: Explains heterogeneous functional impact of weak links; the negative-GC type is proposed as a distinct functional class linking visual/motor to limbic regions.
    The paper provides correlational evidence (differential impact on dynamics and cognition) but no independent experimental handle distinguishing these two classes outside this study.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Overlooked weak structural connections support human cognition under nonlinear connectome scaling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V35BOZRU

@misc{pith2026250524125,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Overlooked weak structural connections support human cognition under nonlinear connectome scaling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V35BOZRU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24125}
}
read the original abstract

Human cognition depends on large scale communication constrained by white matter architecture. Although weak connections are abundant in mammalian connectomes, they have long been treated as noise and downweighted because of tractography uncertainty in the human brain, and their relevance to human cognition and large scale functional organization remains unresolved. Across multiple datasets and tractography pipelines, we show that, when tractography derived connectivity weights are interpreted through a nonlinear weighting framework, weak connections make measurable contributions to cognitive prediction, functional connectivity simulation, and structure-function coupling. These effects are selective: nonlinear weighting improves the prediction of general cognitive ability and memory more than that of crystallized intelligence or processing speed, consistent with the notion that weak connections preferentially expand the modal repertoire of brain networks to enhance both large scale integration and fine grained segregation, thereby supporting the functional balance essential for diverse cognitive abilities. Importantly, these effects are replicated in a reliability aware connectome generated by integrating two post tractography filtering methods, in which preserving weak links consistently outperforms conventional thresholding strategies. Finally, we show that weak connections contain functionally informative subsets organized along systems level and transcriptomic gradients. In particular, a specific class of weak connections, predominantly linking visual and motor systems with limbic regions and characterized by negative gene coexpression, exerts a disproportionately large influence on brain function.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24125 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Weak connectivity contributes to predictions of cognitive abilities. (A) Extraction of cognitive abilities from nine behavioral tasks in four latent factors (g: general cognitive ability, spd: processing speed, cry: crystallized intelligence, mem: memory) using the structure equation modeling (SEM) method. Standardized factor loadings were displayed on the loading paths, and the model fitting parameters were provide… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Filtering more reliable structural connectivity. (A) Using sift2 and commit2 to generate combined and fused SC networks (of one individual). The probability of log10(SC) was also shown. Combined SC: using sift2 partial SC mask but replacing the weight with commit2 SC weight for the overlapping links with commit2. Fused SC: using the commit2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Weak connectivity contributes to the simulation of brain functional organizations. (A) The smallest distance between empirical and simulated FC from fused SC (𝜆 = 0.05) varies with 𝛽. For each , the smallest distance across different coupling strengths 𝑐 was first obtained from each individual and then averaged. The shadow indicates standard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of weak connectivity on segregation and integration. (A) Active size in structural modes was defined as the percentage of significantly active regions (above 1 SD). (B) Segregation-integration balance measure HB for simulated FC networks with different densities…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Organizational principles of weak connectivity. (A) Fused SC (𝜆 = 0.05) and 10% density network for an individual (only upper or lower triangles of the adjacency matrices were shown). The network was subdivided into 7 RSNs: dorsal attention (DOA), fronto-parietal (FP),…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems

    Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009/03/01 2009;10(3):186-198. doi:10.1038/nrn2575

    doi:10.1038/nrn2575 2009

  2. [2]

    Fragility and volatility of structural hubs in the human connectome

    Gollo LL, Roberts JA, Cropley VL, et al. Fragility and volatility of structural hubs in the human connectome. Nat Neurosci. Aug 2018;21(8):1107-1116. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0188-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0188-z 2018

  3. [3]

    A new method for accurate in vivo mapping of human brain connections using microstructural and anatomical information

    Schiavi S, Ocampo -Pineda M, Barakovic M , et al . A new method for accurate in vivo mapping of human brain connections using microstructural and anatomical information. Science advances. 2020;6(31):eaba8245

    2020

  4. [4]

    The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography

    Maier-Hein KH, Neher PF, Houde J -C, et al . The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nature communications. 2017;8(1):1349

    2017

  5. [5]

    Twenty‐five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data

    Jones DK, Cercignani M. Twenty‐five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data. NMR in Biomedicine . 2010;23(7):803-820

    2010

  6. [6]

    White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI

    Jones DK, Knösche TR, Turner R. White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2013;73:239-254

    2013

  7. [7]

    The human connectome: a complex network

    Sporns O. The human connectome: a complex network. Annals of the new York Academy of Sciences . 2011;1224(1):109--125

    2011

  8. [8]

    The connectomics of brain disorders

    Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2015/03/01 2015;16(3):159-172. doi:10.1038/nrn3901

    work page doi:10.1038/nrn3901 2015

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Neuroimaging of cortical dev elopment and brain connectivity in human newborns and animal models

    Lodygensky GA, Vasung L, Sizonenko SV , Hüppi PS. Neuroimaging of cortical dev elopment and brain connectivity in human newborns and animal models. Journal of Anatomy . 2010;217(4):418 -428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01280.x

    2010

  2. [10]

    Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees

    Ardesch DJ, Scholtens LH , Li L, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, van den Heuvel MP. Evolutionary expansion of connectivity between multimodal association areas in the human brain compared with chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(14):7101-7106. doi:doi...

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging

    Ritter P, Schirner M, McIntosh AR, Jirsa VK. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain connectivity. 2013;3(2):121-145

    2013

  4. [12]

    Imitating and exploring the huma n brain's resting and task -performing states via brain computing: scaling and architecture

    Lu W, Zeng L, Wang J, et al. Imitating and exploring the huma n brain's resting and task -performing states via brain computing: scaling and architecture. National Science Review. 2024;11(5):nwae080

    2024

  5. [13]

    Hierarchical connectome modes and critical state jointly maximize human brain functional diversity

    Wang R, Lin P, Liu M, Wu Y , Zhou T, Zhou C. Hierarchical connectome modes and critical state jointly maximize human brain functional diversity. Physical review letters. 2019;123(3):038301

    2019

  6. [14]

    Studying connections in the living human brain with diffusion MRI

    Jones DK. Studying connections in the living human brain with diffusion MRI. cortex. 2008;44(8):936-952

    2008

  7. [15]

    SIFT2: Enabling d ense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography

    Smith RE, Tournier J-D, Calamante F, Connelly A. SIFT2: Enabling d ense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography. Neuroimage. 2015;119:338-351

    2015

  8. [16]

    Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph- theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI? Neuroimage

    Civier O, Smith RE, Yeh CH, Connelly A, Calamante F. Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph- theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI? Neuroimage. 07 01 2019;194:68-81. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.039

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Brain anatomical network and intelligence

    Li Y , Liu Y , Li J , et al . Brain anatomical network and intelligence. PLoS computational biology . 2009;5(5):e1000395

    2009

  10. [18]

    Impaired topological architecture of brain structural networks in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a DTI study

    Li C, Huang B, Zhang R , et al. Impaired topological architecture of brain structural networks in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a DTI study. Brain imaging and behavior. 2017;11(1):113-128

    2017

  11. [19]

    Development of human brain structural networks through infancy and childhood

    Huang H, Shu N, Mishra V , et al . Development of human brain structural networks through infancy and childhood. Cerebral Cortex. 2015;25(5):1389--1404

    2015

  12. [20]

    Geometric renormalization unravels self- similarity of the multiscale huma n connectome

    Zheng M, Allard A, Hagmann P, Alemán-Gómez Y , Serrano MÁ. Geometric renormalization unravels self- similarity of the multiscale huma n connectome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2020;117(33):20244--20253

    2020

  13. [21]

    Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome

    Seguin C, Tian Y , Zalesky A. Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome. Network Neuroscience. 2020;4(4):980--1006

    2020

  14. [22]

    Signal propagation via cortical hierarchies

    Vézquez-Rodríguez B, Liu Z -Q, Hagmann P, Misic B. Signal propagation via cortical hierarchies. Network Neuroscience. 2020;4(4):1072--1090

    2020

  15. [23]

    Inter -areal Balanced Amplificati on Enhances Signal Propagation in a Large -Scale Circuit Model of the Primate Cortex

    Joglekar MR, Mejias JF, Yang GR, Wang XJ. Inter -areal Balanced Amplificati on Enhances Signal Propagation in a Large -Scale Circuit Model of the Primate Cortex. Neuron. 04 04 2018;98(1):222 -234.e8. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.031

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    The Mouse Cortical Connectome, Characterized by an Ultr a- Dense Cortical Graph, Maintains Specificity by Distinct Connectivity Profiles

    Gămănuţ R, Kennedy H, Toroczkai Z , et al . The Mouse Cortical Connectome, Characterized by an Ultr a- Dense Cortical Graph, Maintains Specificity by Distinct Connectivity Profiles. Neuron. 2018/02/07/ 2018;97(3):698-715.e10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.037

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain

    Oh SW, Harris JA, Ng L , et al . A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature. 2014/04/01 2014;508(7495):207-214. doi:10.1038/nature13186

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    A weighted and directed interareal connectivity matrix for macaque cerebral cortex

    Markov NT, Ercsey -Ravasz M, Ribeiro Gomes A , et al . A weighted and directed interareal connectivity matrix for macaque cerebral cortex. Cerebral cortex. 2014;24(1):17--36

    2014

  19. [27]

    Structural attributes and principles of the 41 neocortical connectome in the marmoset monkey

    Theodoni P, Majka P, Reser DH, Wójcik DK, Rosa MG, Wang X-J. Structural attributes and principles of the 41 neocortical connectome in the marmoset monkey. Cerebral Cortex. 2022;32(1):15-28

    2022

  20. [28]

    A Large-Scale High-Density Weighted Structural Connectome of the Macaque Brain Acquired by Predicting Missing Links

    Chen Y , Zhang Z-K, He Y , Zhou C. A Large-Scale High-Density Weighted Structural Connectome of the Macaque Brain Acquired by Predicting Missing Links. Cerebral Cortex . 2020;30(9):4771 -4789. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa060

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    Comparison of diffusion tractography and tract‐ tracing measures of connectivity strength in rhesus macaque connectome

    van den Heuvel MP, de Reus MA, Feldman Barrett L, et al. Comparison of diffusion tractography and tract‐ tracing measures of connectivity strength in rhesus macaque connectome. 2015. 1065-9471

    2015

  22. [30]

    Comparison between diffusion MRI tractography and histological tract- tracing of cortico-cortical structural connectivity in the ferret brain

    Delettre C, Messé A, Dell L-A, et al. Comparison between diffusion MRI tractography and histological tract- tracing of cortico-cortical structural connectivity in the ferret brain. Network Neuroscience. 2019;3(4):1038-1050

    2019

  23. [31]

    Using diffusion tr actography to predict cortical connection strength and distance: a quantitative comparison with tracers in the monkey

    Donahue CJ, Sotiropoulos SN, Jbabdi S , et al . Using diffusion tr actography to predict cortical connection strength and distance: a quantitative comparison with tracers in the monkey. Journal of Neuroscience . 2016;36(25):6758-6770

    2016

  24. [32]

    Specificity and robustness of long -distance connections in weighted, interareal connectomes

    Betzel RF, Bassett DS. Specificity and robustness of long -distance connections in weighted, interareal connectomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(21):E4880--E4889

    2018

  25. [33]

    Cortical high-density counterstream architectures

    Markov NT, Ercsey-Ravasz M, Van Essen DC, Knoblauch K, Toroczkai Z, Kennedy H. Cortical high-density counterstream architectures. Science. 2013;342(6158):1238406

    2013

  26. [34]

    Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography

    Reveley C, Seth AK, Pierpaoli C, et al. Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2015;112(21):E2820-E2828. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.1418198112

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    The WU -Minn human connectome project: an overview

    Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM , et al . The WU -Minn human connectome project: an overview. Neuroimage. 2013:62--79

    2013

  28. [36]

    MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation

    Tournier J-D, Smith R, Raffelt D, et al. MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage. 2019;202:116137

    2019

  29. [37]

    Consistency -based thresholding of the human connectome

    Roberts JA, Perry A, Roberts G, Mitchell PB, Breakspear M. Consistency -based thresholding of the human connectome. NeuroImage. 2017;145:118--129

    2017

  30. [38]

    Segregation, integration and balance of large-scale resting brain networks configure different cognitive abilities

    Wang R, Liu M, Cheng X, Wu Y , Hildebrandt A, Zhou C. Segregation, integration and balance of large-scale resting brain networks configure different cognitive abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci . Febr uary 01, 2021 2021;118(23):e2022288118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2022288118

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Scikit -learn: Machine learning in Python

    Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A , et al . Scikit -learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research. 2011;12:2825-2830

    2011

  32. [40]

    Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? neuroimage

    Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? neuroimage. 2007;34(1):144-155

    2007

  33. [41]

    A general framework for characterizing optimal communication in brain networks

    Fakhar K, Hadaeghi F, Seguin C , et al . A general framework for characterizing optimal communication in brain networks. eLife. 2025/04/17 2025;13:RP101780. doi:10.7554/eLife.101780

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset? Neuroimage

    Schilling KG, Rheault F, Petit L , et al . Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset? Neuroimage. 2021;243:118502

    2021

  35. [43]

    Predicting brain structural network using functional connectivity

    Zhang L, Wang L, Zhu D, Initiative AsDN. Predicting brain structural network using functional connectivity. Medical image analysis. 2022;79:102463

    2022

  36. [44]

    Human brain networks function in connectome -specific harmonic waves

    Atasoy S, Donnelly I, Pearson J. Human brain networks function in connectome -specific harmonic waves. Nature Communications. 2016/01/21 2016;7(1):10340. doi:10.1038/ncomms10340

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsicfunctional connectivity

    Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J , et al . The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsicfunctional connectivity. Journal of neurophysiology. 2011

    2011

  38. [46]

    Hierarchical Genetic Organization of Human Cortical Surface Area

    Chen C-H, Gutierrez ED, Thompson W, et al. Hierarchical Genetic Organization of Human Cortical Surface Area. Science. 2012/03/30 2012;335(6076):1634-1636. doi:10.1126/science.1215330

    2012 doi

  39. [47]

    Hierarchy of transcr iptomic specialization across human cortex captured by structural neuroimaging topography

    Burt JB, Demirtaş M, Eckner WJ , et al . Hierarchy of transcr iptomic specialization across human cortex captured by structural neuroimaging topography. Nature Neuroscience . 2018/09/01 2018;21(9):1251 -1259. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0195-0

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    Situating the default -mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization

    Margulies DS, Ghosh SS, Goulas A, et al. Situating the default -mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2016/11/01 2016;113(44):12574-12579. doi:10.1073/pnas.1608282113

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients

    Tian Y , Margulies DS, Breakspear M, Zalesky A. Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. Nat Neurosci . Nov 2020;23(11):1421 -1432. doi:10.1038/s41593 -020- 00711-6

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    Backward spreading of memory-retrieval signal in the primate temporal cortex

    Naya Y , Yoshida M, Miyashita Y . Backward spreading of memory-retrieval signal in the primate temporal cortex. Science. Jan 26 2001;291(5504):661-4. doi:10.1126/science.291.5504.661

    2001 doi

  43. [51]

    Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations

    Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2010;52(3):1059-1069. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    Distance -dependent consensus thresholds for generating group - representative structural brain networks

    Betzel RF, Griffa A, Hagmann P, Mišić B. Distance -dependent consensus thresholds for generating group - representative structural brain networks. Network neuroscience. 2019;3(2):475--496

    2019

  45. [53]

    Whole-brain structural connectivity predicts cognitive deficits in pretreated glioma patients

    Friedrich M, Filss CP, Lohmann P , et al . Whole-brain structural connectivity predicts cognitive deficits in pretreated glioma patients. 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Individual Variability in the Structural Connectivity Architecture of the 42 Human Brain

    Huang W, Chen H, Liu Z , et al . Individual Variability in the Structural Connectivity Architecture of the 42 Human Brain. bioRxiv. 2023:2023.01. 11.523683

    2023

  47. [55]

    Structural connectome-based prediction of trait anxiety

    Yoo C, Park S, Kim MJ. Structural connectome-based prediction of trait anxiety. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2022;16(6):2467-2476

    2022

  48. [56]

    Topological reorganization after partial auditory deprivation— a structural connectivity study in single-sided deafness

    Li X, Qiao Y , Shen H, Niu Z, Shang Y , Guo H. Topological reorganization after partial auditory deprivation— a structural connectivity study in single-sided deafness. Hearing Research. 2019;380:75-83

    2019

  49. [57]

    A Large-Scale High-Density Weighted Structural Connectome of the Macaque Brain Acquired by Predicting Missing Links

    Chen Y , Zhang Z-K, He Y , Zhou C. A Large-Scale High-Density Weighted Structural Connectome of the Macaque Brain Acquired by Predicting Missing Links. Cerebral Cortex. 2020;30(9):4771--4789

    2020

  50. [58]

    The strength of weak connections in the macaque cortico -cortical network

    Goulas A, Schaefer A, Margulies DS. The strength of weak connections in the macaque cortico -cortical network. Brain Structure and Function. 2015;220(5):2939--2951

    2015

  51. [59]

    Genetic polymorphisms in COMT and BDNF influence synchronization dynamics of human neuronal oscillations

    Simola J, Siebenhühner F, Myrov V , et al . Genetic polymorphisms in COMT and BDNF influence synchronization dynamics of human neuronal oscillations. iScience. 2022/09/16/ 2022;25(9):104985. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104985

    2022

  52. [60]

    Cortical hierarchy, dual counterstream architecture and the importance of top -down generative networks

    Vezoli J, Magrou L, Goebel R, et al. Cortical hierarchy, dual counterstream architecture and the importance of top -down generative networks. NeuroImage. 2021/01/15/ 2021;225:117479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117479

    2021

  53. [61]

    Termination of the geniculocortical projection in the striate cortex of macaque monkey: A quantitative immunoelectron microscopic study

    Latawiec D, Martin KAC, Meskenaite V . Termination of the geniculocortical projection in the striate cortex of macaque monkey: A quantitative immunoelectron microscopic study. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096- 9861(20000410)419:3<306::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-2. Journal of Comparat...

    doi

  54. [62]

    Cortical response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses

    Scholl B, Thomas CI, Ryan MA, Kamasawa N, Fitzpatrick D. Cortical response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses. Nature. 2021;590(7844):111-114

    2021

  55. [63]

    Critical Avalanches in Excitation -Inhibition Balanced Networks Reconcile Response Reliability with Sensitivity for Optimal Neural Representation

    Yang Z, Liang J, Zhou C. Critical Avalanches in Excitation -Inhibition Balanced Networks Reconcile Response Reliability with Sensitivity for Optimal Neural Representation. Physical Review Le tters. 2025;134(2):028401

    2025

  56. [64]

    Modular Segregation of Structural Brain Networks Supports the Development of Executive Function in Youth

    Baum GL, Ciric R, Roalf DR , et al . Modular Segregation of Structural Brain Networks Supports the Development of Executive Function in Youth. Curr Biol . Jun 05 2017;27(11):1561 -1572.e8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.051

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    Brain functional network modeling and analysis based on fMRI: a systematic review

    Wang Z, Xin J, Wang Z, Yao Y , Zhao Y , Qian W. Brain functional network modeling and analysis based on fMRI: a systematic review. Cognitive Neurodynamics. 2021/06/01 2021;15(3):389-403. doi:10.1007/s11571-020- 09630-5

    2021 doi

  58. [66]

    ‘Hierarchy’ in the organization of brain networks

    Hilgetag CC, Goulas A. ‘Hierarchy’ in the organization of brain networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020/04/13 2020;375(1796):20190319. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0319

    2020

  59. [67]

    Inversion of a large -scale circuit model reveals a co rtical hierarchy in the dynamic resting human brain

    Wang P, Kong R, Kong X, et al. Inversion of a large -scale circuit model reveals a co rtical hierarchy in the dynamic resting human brain. Sci Adv. Jan 2019;5(1):eaat7854. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat7854

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    Anatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex

    Markov NT, Vezoli J, Chameau P , et al . Anatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23458. Journal of Comparative Neurology . 2014/01/01 2014;522(1):225-259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23458

    2014 doi

  61. [69]

    Bo ttom-Up and Top -Down Attention: Different Processes and Overlapping Neural Systems

    Katsuki F, Constantinidis C. Bo ttom-Up and Top -Down Attention: Different Processes and Overlapping Neural Systems. The Neuroscientist. 2014/10/01 2013;20(5):509-521. doi:10.1177/1073858413514136

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    Forward and backward connections in the brain: A DCM study of functional asymmetries

    Chen CC, Henson RN, Stephan KE, Kilner JM, Friston KJ. Forward and backward connections in the brain: A DCM study of functional asymmetries. NeuroImage. 2009/04/01/ 2009;45(2):453 -462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.041

    2009 doi

  63. [71]

    Structural and effective connectivity reveals potential network-based influences on category-sensitive visual areas

    Furl N. Structural and effective connectivity reveals potential network-based influences on category-sensitive visual areas. Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9

    2015

  64. [72]

    Feedforward and feedback frequency -dependent interactions in a large -scale laminar network of the primate cortex

    Mejias JF, Murray JD, Kennedy H, Wang XJ. Feedforward and feedback frequency -dependent interactions in a large -scale laminar network of the primate cortex. Sci Adv . Nov 2016;2(11):e1601335. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601335

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    Long-range and local circuits for top -down modulation of visual cortex processing

    Zhang S, Xu M, Kamigaki T , et al. Long-range and local circuits for top -down modulation of visual cortex processing. Science. 2014/08/08 2014;345(6197):660-665. doi:10.1126/science.1254126

    2014 doi

  66. [74]

    The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective

    Van Essen DC, Ugurbil K, Auerbach E, et al. The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective. Neuroimage. 2012;62(4):2222--2231

    2012

  67. [75]

    The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project

    Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA , et al . The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013;80:105--124

    2013

  68. [76]

    COMMI T: convex optimization modeling for microstructure informed tractography

    Daducci A, Dal Palù A, Lemkaddem A, Thiran J -P. COMMI T: convex optimization modeling for microstructure informed tractography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2014;34(1):246-257

    2014

  69. [77]

    Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity

    Schölvinck ML, Maier A, Frank QY , Duyn JH, Leopold DA. Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(22):10238-10243. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913110107

    2010 doi

  70. [78]

    Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more

    Rosseel Y . Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1-36

    2012

  71. [79]

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus 43 new alternatives

    Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus 43 new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1-55

    1999

  72. [80]

    Macroscopic resting-state brain dynamics are best described by linear models

    Nozari E, Bertolero MA, Stiso J, et al. Macroscopic resting-state brain dynamics are best described by linear models. Nature biomedical engineering. 2024;8(1):68-84

    2024

  73. [81]

    Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich -clubs

    Zamora-López G, Chen Y , Deco G, Kringelbach ML, Zhou C. Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich -clubs. Scientific reports . 2016;6(1):38424

    2016

  74. [82]

    Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns

    Jansen BH, Rit VG. Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biological cybernetics. 1995;73(4):357-366

    1995

  75. [83]

    The effect of scan length on t he reliability of resting -state fMRI connectivity estimates

    Birn RM, Molloy EK, Patriat R , et al . The effect of scan length on t he reliability of resting -state fMRI connectivity estimates. Neuroimage. 2013;83:550-558

    2013

  76. [84]

    Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning

    Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Carlson JM, Grafton ST. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . May 3 2011;108(18):7641-7646. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018985108

    2011 doi

  77. [85]

    Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems

    Munkres J. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. Journal of the society for industrial and applied mathematics. 1957;5(1):32--38

    1957

  78. [86]

    Guide to Graph Algorithms

    Erciyes K. Guide to Graph Algorithms. Springer; 2018

    2018

  79. [87]

    An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome

    Hawrylycz MJ, Lein ES, Guillozet -Bongaarts AL, et al . An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature. 2012;489(7416):391-399

    2012

  80. [88]

    Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox

    Markello RD, Arnatkeviciute A, Poline J -B, Fulcher BD, Fornito A, Misic B. Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox. eLife. 2021/11/16 2021;10:e72129. doi:10.7554/eLife.72129

    2021 doi

  81. [89]

    Construct ion of embedded fMRI resting -state functional connectivity networks using manifold learning

    Gallos IK, Galaris E, Siettos CI. Construct ion of embedded fMRI resting -state functional connectivity networks using manifold learning. Cogn Neurodyn. Aug 2021;15(4):585-608. doi:10.1007/s11571-020-09645-y Supporting Information Supporting Information is available from the W...

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.