pith. sign in

arxiv: 0910.2734 · v1 · pith:J5RXXMXXnew · submitted 2009-10-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Reply to Comment on "Signatures of surface states in bismuth at high magnetic fields"

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords arxivanomalousbismuthcommentfieldshighmagneticobserved
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In a Comment [arXiv:0910.1256], Behnia contends that the surface theory put forward in our recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 136803 (2009); arXiv:0905.0689] as an alternative explanation of the anomalous peaks observed in Nernst measurement on a single-crystal bismuth sample at high (> 9 T) magnetic fields [Science 317, 1729 (2007); arXiv:0802.1993] is not consistent with the order of magnitude and shape of the anomalous peaks observed in the experiment. We explain in this Reply why this contention is not true.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.