Reply to Comment on `Monte-Carlo simulation study of the two-stage percolation transition in enhanced binary trees'

We discuss the nature of the two-stage percolation transition on the enhanced binary tree in order to explain the disagreement in the estimation of the second transition probability between the one in our recent paper (J. Phys. A:Math. Theor. 42 (2009) 145001) and the one in the comment to it from Baek, Minnhagen and Kim. We point out some reasons that the finite size scaling analysis used by them is not proper for the enhanced tree due to its nonamenable nature, which is verified by some numerical results.