pith. sign in

arxiv: 1010.4233 · v1 · pith:6NSXHDLAnew · submitted 2010-10-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Reply to "Comment on 'Semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states' "

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords lemmaconclusioncorrectfirstoriginalproofreplysecond
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently Boyer and Mor pointed out the first conclusion of Lemma 1 in our original paper is not correct, and therefore, the proof of Theorem 5 based on Lemma 1 is wrong. Furthermore, they gave a direct proof for Theorem 5 and affirmed the conclusions in our original paper. In this reply, we admit the first conclusion of Lemma 1 is not correct, but we need to point out the second conclusion of Lemma 1 is correct. Accordingly, all the proofs for Lemma 2, Lemma 3, and Theorems 3--6 are only based on the the second conclusion of Lemma 1 and therefore are correct.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.