Recognition: unknown
On the Validity of Covariate Adjustment for Estimating Causal Effects
read the original abstract
Identifying effects of actions (treatments) on outcome variables from observational data and causal assumptions is a fundamental problem in causal inference. This identification is made difficult by the presence of confounders which can be related to both treatment and outcome variables. Confounders are often handled, both in theory and in practice, by adjusting for covariates, in other words considering outcomes conditioned on treatment and covariate values, weighed by probability of observing those covariate values. In this paper, we give a complete graphical criterion for covariate adjustment, which we term the adjustment criterion, and derive some interesting corollaries of the completeness of this criterion.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generalization of Pearl's Front-Door Criterion
A new weakened set of graph conditions makes the front-door formula valid for identifying total causal effects under latent confounding in more cases than Pearl's original criterion.
-
An adaptive variance estimator for relative sparsity
A new adaptive variance estimator for relative sparsity coefficients is introduced that fully utilizes the prior asymptotic normality theorem and incorporates variable selection effects.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.