pith. sign in

arxiv: 1207.2647 · v1 · pith:N5T6H2PVnew · submitted 2012-07-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Generic Misalignment Aberration Patterns and the Subspace of Benign Misalignment

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords aberrationanastigmatmirrormisalignmentthreeaddressanswerbenign
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Q1: Why deploy N wavefront sensors on a three mirror anastigmat (TMA) and not N + 1? Q2: Why measure M Zernike coefficients and not M + 1? Q3: Why control L rigid body degrees of freedom (total) on the secondary and tertiary and not L + 1? The usual answer: "We did a lot of ray tracing and N,M, and L seemed OK." We show how straightforward results from aberration theory may be used to address these questions. We consider, in particular, the case of a three mirror anastigmat.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.