pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 1212.4357 · v2 · pith:C7U32V5Tnew · submitted 2012-12-18 · 🌀 gr-qc

Improved effective-one-body description of coalescing nonspinning black-hole binaries and its numerical-relativity completion

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords massbinariescoalescingdatadescriptioneffective-one-bodyevolutionfind
0
0 comments X p. Extension
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{C7U32V5T}

Prints a linked pith:C7U32V5T badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We improve the effective-one-body (EOB) description of nonspinning coalescing black hole binaries by incorporating several recent analytical advances, notably: (i) logarithmic contributions to the conservative dynamics; (ii) resummed horizon-absorption contribution to the orbital angular momentum loss; and (iii) a specific radial component of the radiation reaction force implied by consistency with the azimuthal one. We then complete this analytically improved EOB model by comparing it to accurate numerical relativity (NR) simulations performed by the Caltech-Cornell-CITA group for mass ratios $q=(1,2,3,4,6)$. In particular, the comparison to NR data allows us to determine with high-accuracy ($\sim 10^{-4}$) the value of the main EOB radial potential: $A(u;\,\nu)$, where $u=GM/(R c^2)$ is the inter-body gravitational potential and $\nu=q/(q+1)^2$ is the symmetric mass ratio. We introduce a new technique for extracting from NR data an intrinsic measure of the phase evolution, ($Q_\omega(\omega)$ diagnostics). Aligning the NR-completed EOB quadrupolar waveform and the NR one at low frequencies, we find that they keep agreeing (in phase and amplitude) within the NR uncertainties throughout the evolution for all mass ratios considered. We also find good agreement for several subdominant multipoles without having to introduce and tune any extra parameters.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.