pith. sign in

arxiv: 1303.0965 · v1 · pith:GAAWZ5SCnew · submitted 2013-03-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

On the validity of the method of reduction of dimensionality: area of contact, average interfacial separation and contact stiffness

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords contactelasticinterfacialmappingareaaveragecalculatefoundation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It has recently been suggested that many contact mechanics problems between solids can be accurately studied by mapping the problem on an effective one dimensional (1D) elastic foundation model. Using this 1D mapping we calculate the contact area and the average interfacial separation between elastic solids with nominally flat but randomly rough surfaces. We show, by comparison to exact numerical results, that the 1D mapping method fails even qualitatively. We also calculate the normal interfacial stiffness $K$ and compare it with the result of an analytical study. We attribute the failure of the elastic foundation model to the neglect of the long-range elastic coupling between the asperity contact regions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.