pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1310.7426 · v2 · submitted 2013-10-28 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Nonequivalence of equivalence principles

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords equivalenceprinciplesdifferentgeneralgravitationprinciplerelativityrole
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Equivalence principles played a central role in the development of general relativity. Furthermore, they have provided operative procedures for testing the validity of general relativity, or constraining competing theories of gravitation. This has led to a flourishing of different, and inequivalent, formulations of these principles, with the undesired consequence that often the same name, "equivalence principle", is associated with statements having a quite different physical meaning. In this paper we provide a precise formulation of the several incarnations of the equivalence principle, clarifying their uses and reciprocal relations. We also discuss their possible role as selecting principles in the design and classification of viable theories of gravitation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

    gr-qc 2014-03 accept novelty 2.0

    Experiments confirm general relativity to high precision in weak-field and strong-field regimes, with gravitational wave damping matching predictions to better than 0.5 percent.