pith. sign in

arxiv: 1402.3102 · v1 · pith:KV6W35R5new · submitted 2014-02-13 · 🪐 quant-ph

Measurement Uncertainty: Reply to Critics

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords ozawaarxivheisenbergallegationsanswerapparentapproachcalled
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In a recent publication [PRL 111, 160405 (2013)] we proved a version of Heisenberg's error-disturbance tradeoff. This result was in apparent contradiction to claims by Ozawa of having refuted these ideas of Heisenberg. In a direct reaction [arXiv:1308.3540] Ozawa has called our work groundless, and has claimed to have found both a counterexample and an error in our proof. Here we answer to these allegations. We also comment on the submission [arXiv:1307.3604] by Rozema et al, in which our approach is unfavourably compared to that of Ozawa.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.