pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1402.6169 · v1 · submitted 2014-02-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Composition analysis based on Bayesian methods

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE
keywords methodscompositiondiscriminationmeanvaluedistributionsfunctionlikelihood
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work we test the most widely used methods for fitting the composition fraction in data, namely maximum likelihood, $\chi^2$, mean value of the distributions and mean value of the posterior probability function. We discuss the discrimination power of the four methods in different scenarios: signal to noise discrimination; two signals; and distributions of Xmax for mixed primary mass composition. We introduce a "distance" parameter, which can be used to estimate, as a rule of thumb, the precision of the discrimination. Finally, we conclude that the most reliable methods in all the studied scenarios are the maximum likelihood and the mean value of the posterior probability function.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.