pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1406.0022 · v3 · pith:PJ2CLD3Fnew · submitted 2014-05-30 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Error Decay of (almost) Consistent Signal Estimations from Quantized Gaussian Random Projections

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords consistentquantizederrormathbbrandomsignalfrachigh
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper provides new error bounds on "consistent" reconstruction methods for signals observed from quantized random projections. Those signal estimation techniques guarantee a perfect matching between the available quantized data and a new observation of the estimated signal under the same sensing model. Focusing on dithered uniform scalar quantization of resolution $\delta>0$, we prove first that, given a Gaussian random frame of $\mathbb R^N$ with $M$ vectors, the worst-case $\ell_2$-error of consistent signal reconstruction decays with high probability as $O(\frac{N}{M}\log\frac{M}{\sqrt N})$ uniformly for all signals of the unit ball $\mathbb B^N \subset \mathbb R^N$. Up to a log factor, this matches a known lower bound in $\Omega(N/M)$ and former empirical validations in $O(N/M)$. Equivalently, if $M$ exceeds a minimal number of frame coefficients growing like $O(\frac{N}{\epsilon_0}\log \frac{\sqrt N}{\epsilon_0})$, any vectors in $\mathbb B^N$ with $M$ identical quantized projections are at most $\epsilon_0$ apart with high probability. Second, in the context of Quantized Compressed Sensing with $M$ Gaussian random measurements and under the same scalar quantization scheme, consistent reconstructions of $K$-sparse signals of $\mathbb R^N$ have a worst-case error that decreases with high probability as $O(\tfrac{K}{M}\log\tfrac{MN}{\sqrt K^3})$ uniformly for all such signals. Finally, we show that the proximity of vectors whose quantized random projections are only approximately consistent can still be bounded with high probability. A certain level of corruption is thus allowed in the quantization process, up to the appearance of a systematic bias in the reconstruction error of (almost) consistent signal estimates.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.