pith. sign in

arxiv: 1406.1289 · v1 · pith:SIJBKGFCnew · submitted 2014-06-05 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Disagreement between capture probabilities extracted from capture and quasi-elastic backscattering excitation functions

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords captureexcitationextractedfunctionsprobabilitiesquasi-elasticbackscatteringdisagreement
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Experimental quasi-elastic backscattering and capture (fusion) excitation functions are usually used to extract the s-wave capture probabilities for the heavy-ion reactions. We investigated the $^{16}$O+$^{120}$Sn,$^{144}$Sm,$^{208}$Pb systems at energies near and below the corresponding Coulomb barriers and concluded that the probabilities extracted from quasi-elastic data are much larger than the ones extracted from fusion excitation functions at sub and deep-sub barrier energies. This seems to be a reasonable explanation for the known disagreement observed in literature for the nuclear potential diffuseness derived from both methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.