pith. sign in

arxiv: 1503.01429 · v1 · pith:LIL4OATAnew · submitted 2015-03-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-lat

Optimisation of Quantum Evolution Algorithms

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-lat
keywords evolutionalgorithmserrorquantumusedcomplexitycomputationalcontrol
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Given a quantum Hamiltonian and its evolution time, the corresponding unitary evolution operator can be constructed in many different ways, corresponding to different trajectories between the desired end-points. A choice among these trajectories can then be made to obtain the best computational complexity and control over errors. As an explicit example, Grover's quantum search algorithm is described as a Hamiltonian evolution problem. It is shown that the computational complexity has a power-law dependence on error when a straightforward Lie-Trotter discretisation formula is used, and it becomes logarithmic in error when reflection operators are used. The exponential change in error control is striking, and can be used to improve many importance sampling methods. The key concept is to make the evolution steps as large as possible while obeying the constraints of the problem. In particular, we can understand why overrelaxation algorithms are superior to small step size algorithms.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.