pith. sign in

arxiv: 1512.05903 · v2 · pith:4SPFHZ3Onew · submitted 2015-12-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum algorithms and the finite element method

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantumalgorithmmethodsolutionelementequationsfinitelinear
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The finite element method is used to approximately solve boundary value problems for differential equations. The method discretises the parameter space and finds an approximate solution by solving a large system of linear equations. Here we investigate the extent to which the finite element method can be accelerated using an efficient quantum algorithm for solving linear equations. We consider the representative general question of approximately computing a linear functional of the solution to a boundary value problem, and compare the quantum algorithm's theoretical performance with that of a standard classical algorithm -- the conjugate gradient method. Prior work had claimed that the quantum algorithm could be exponentially faster, but did not determine the overall classical and quantum runtimes required to achieve a predetermined solution accuracy. Taking this into account, we find that the quantum algorithm can achieve a polynomial speedup, the extent of which grows with the dimension of the partial differential equation. In addition, we give evidence that no improvement of the quantum algorithm could lead to a super-polynomial speedup when the dimension is fixed and the solution satisfies certain smoothness properties.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A shortcut to an optimal quantum linear system solver

    quant-ph 2024-06 accept novelty 7.0

    The paper gives a QLSS with query complexity (1+O(ε))κ ln(2√2/ε) using one kernel reflection when ||x|| is known, or O(κ log(1/ε)) overall, with explicit bound 56κ + 1.05κ ln(1/ε).