Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Limits on Einstein's Equivalence Principle from the first localized Fast Radio Burst FRB 150418

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.07643 v2 pith:YHSR6MEN submitted 2016-02-24 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

Limits on Einstein's Equivalence Principle from the first localized Fast Radio Burst FRB 150418

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE
keywords limitsdelaystimecitetdeltafirstgammaobserved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fast Radio Bursts have recently been used to place limits on Einstein's Equivalence Principle via observations of time delays between photons of different radio frequencies by \citet{wei15}. These limits on differential post-Newtonian parameters ($\Delta \gamma<2.52\times10^{-8}$) are the best yet achieved but still rely on uncertain assumptions, namely the relative contributions of dispersion and gravitational delays to the observed time delays and the distances to FRBs. Also very recently, the first FRB host galaxy has likely been identified, providing the first redshift-based distance estimate to FRB 150418 \citep{kea16}. Moreover, consistency between the \omegaigm\ estimate from FRB 150418 and \omegaigm~expected from $\Lambda$CDM models and WMAP observations leads one to conclude that the observed time delay for FRB 150418 is highly dominated by dispersion, with any gravitational delays small contributors. This points to even tighter limits on $\Delta \gamma$. In this paper, the technique of \citet{wei15} is applied to FRB 150418 to produce a limit of $\Delta \gamma < 1 - 2\times10^{-9}$, approximately an order of magnitude better than previous limits and in line with expectations by \citet{wei15} for what could be achieved if the dispersive delay is separated from other effects. Future substantial improvements in such limits will depend on accurately determining the contribution of individual ionized components to the total observed time delays for FRBs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.