pith. sign in

arxiv: 1609.05136 · v2 · pith:XP37S72Pnew · submitted 2016-09-16 · 💻 cs.GT · cs.CC

Hardness Results for Consensus-Halving

classification 💻 cs.GT cs.CC
keywords problemconsensus-halvingepsilonportionsapproximatecutsppad-hardconstant
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study the consensus-halving problem of dividing an object into two portions, such that each of $n$ agents has equal valuation for the two portions. The $\epsilon$-approximate consensus-halving problem allows each agent to have an $\epsilon$ discrepancy on the values of the portions. We prove that computing $\epsilon$-approximate consensus-halving solution using $n$ cuts is in PPA, and is PPAD-hard, where $\epsilon$ is some positive constant; the problem remains PPAD-hard when we allow a constant number of additional cuts. It is NP-hard to decide whether a solution with $n-1$ cuts exists for the problem. As a corollary of our results, we obtain that the approximate computational version of the Continuous Necklace Splitting Problem is PPAD-hard when the number of portions $t$ is two.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.