Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mean likelihood estimators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.00884 v1 pith:5W3GLXA2 submitted 2016-11-03 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords likelihoodestimatormeanmathematicabayescriteriaestimatorsjeffrey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of {\it Mathematica} in deriving mean likelihood estimators is discussed. Comparisons between the maximum likelihood estimator, the mean likelihood estimator and the Bayes estimate based on a Jeffrey's noninformative prior using the criteria mean-square error and Pitman measure of closeness. Based on these criteria we find that for the first-order moving-average time series model, the mean likelihood estimator outperforms the maximum likelihood estimator and the Bayes estimator with a Jeffrey's noninformative prior. {\it Mathematica} was used for symbolic and numeric computations as well as for the graphical display of results. A {\it Mathematica} notebook is available which provides supplementary derivations and code from http://www.stats.uwo.ca/mcleod/epubs/mele The interested reader can easily reproduce or extend any of the results in this paper using this supplement.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools