pith. sign in

arxiv: 1701.02903 · v2 · pith:ZRH5XTOUnew · submitted 2017-01-11 · 💻 cs.FL · cs.GT· cs.LO

On Delay and Regret Determinization of Max-Plus Automata

classification 💻 cs.FL cs.GTcs.LO
keywords alphadeterminizabledeterminizationk-delayr-regretsomeabsoluteaccepting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Decidability of the determinization problem for weighted automata over the semiring $(\mathbb{Z} \cup {-\infty}, \max, +)$, WA for short, is a long-standing open question. We propose two ways of approaching it by constraining the search space of deterministic WA: k-delay and r-regret. A WA N is k-delay determinizable if there exists a deterministic automaton D that defines the same function as N and for all words {\alpha} in the language of N, the accepting run of D on {\alpha} is always at most k-away from a maximal accepting run of N on {\alpha}. That is, along all prefixes of the same length, the absolute difference between the running sums of weights of the two runs is at most k. A WA N is r-regret determinizable if for all words {\alpha} in its language, its non-determinism can be resolved on the fly to construct a run of N such that the absolute difference between its value and the value assigned to {\alpha} by N is at most r. We show that a WA is determinizable if and only if it is k-delay determinizable for some k. Hence deciding the existence of some k is as difficult as the general determinization problem. When k and r are given as input, the k-delay and r-regret determinization problems are shown to be EXPtime-complete. We also show that determining whether a WA is r-regret determinizable for some r is in EXPtime.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.