pith. sign in

arxiv: 1701.03775 · v1 · pith:XVOASDXMnew · submitted 2017-01-13 · 🪐 quant-ph

Percolation thresholds for photonic quantum computing

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords clusterlambdamicroclustersquantumentangledphotonphotoniccomputing
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Any quantum algorithm can be implemented by an adaptive sequence of single node measurements on an entangled cluster of qubits in a square lattice topology. Photons are a promising candidate for encoding qubits but assembling a photonic entangled cluster with linear optical elements relies on probabilistic operations. Given a supply of $n$-photon-entangled microclusters, using a linear optical circuit and photon detectors, one can assemble a random entangled state of photons that can be subsequently "renormalized" into a logical cluster for universal quantum computing. In this paper, we prove that there is a fundamental tradeoff between $n$ and the minimum success probability $\lambda_c^{(n)}$ that each two-photon linear-optical fusion operation must have, in order to guarantee that the resulting state can be renormalized: $\lambda_c^{(n)} \ge 1/(n-1)$. We present a new way of formulating this problem where $\lambda_c^{(n)}$ is the bond percolation threshold of a logical graph and provide explicit constructions to produce a percolated cluster using $n=3$ photon microclusters (GHZ states) as the initial resource. We settle a heretofore open question by showing that a renormalizable cluster can be created with $3$-photon microclusters over a 2D graph without feedforward, which makes the scheme extremely attractive for an integrated-photonic realization. We also provide lattice constructions, which show that $0.5 \le \lambda_c^{(3)} \le 0.5898$, improving on a recent result of $\lambda_c^{(3)} \le 0.625$. Finally, we discuss how losses affect the bounds on the threshold, using loss models inspired by a recently-proposed method to produce photonic microclusters using quantum dot emitters.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.