Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Novel Design and Performance Optimization Methodology for Hydraulic Cross-Flow Turbines using Successive Numerical Simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.07043 v4 pith:UXKOTNNK submitted 2017-02-22 physics.flu-dyn

A Novel Design and Performance Optimization Methodology for Hydraulic Cross-Flow Turbines using Successive Numerical Simulations

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords designprocessturbineapproachcross-flowhydraulicmethodologynumerical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a new methodology for designing and optimizing the performance of hydraulic Cross-Flow turbines for a wide range of operating conditions. The methodology is based on a one-step approach for the system-level design phase and a three-step, successive numerical analysis approach for the detail design phase. Compared to current design methodologies, not only does this approach break down the process into well-defined steps and simplify it, but it also has the advantage that once numerical simulations are conducted for a single turbine, most of the results can be used for an entire class of Cross-Flow turbines. In this paper, after a discussion of the research background, we explain the design process used and the ANSYS-based CFD model of the turbine in detail. The design process consists of three steps. First, designing nozzle geometry; second, optimizing runner parameters; and third, enhancing turbine performance by analyzing various load conditions. A turbine designed using this process in a simulation case study achieves a peak hydraulic efficiency of 91% and peak overall efficiency of 82% that is maintained for volume flow rates as low as 14% of the nominal value and water head variations up to 30% of the nominal value.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.