pith. sign in

arxiv: 1703.01601 · v2 · pith:ZII4XFFAnew · submitted 2017-03-05 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.DL· physics.soc-ph· q-bio.OT

Doing Things Twice (Or Differently): Strategies to Identify Studies for Targeted Validation

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.DLphysics.soc-phq-bio.OT
keywords scientificstudiesdatadiscussedidentifyreproducibilityresearchscience
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The "reproducibility crisis" has been a highly visible source of scientific controversy and dispute. Here, I propose and review several avenues for identifying and prioritizing research studies for the purpose of targeted validation. Of the various proposals discussed, I identify scientific data science as being a strategy that merits greater attention among those interested in reproducibility. I argue that the tremendous potential of scientific data science for uncovering high-value research studies is a significant and rarely discussed benefit of the transition to a fully open-access publishing model.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.