pith. sign in

arxiv: 1705.09827 · v2 · pith:GMLLORU5new · submitted 2017-05-27 · 💱 q-fin.TR · math.OC· math.PR

Mini-Flash Crashes, Model Risk, and Optimal Execution

classification 💱 q-fin.TR math.OCmath.PR
keywords crashesmini-flashmarketpriceswillagentsbeliefsexecution
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:GMLLORU5 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{GMLLORU5}

Prints a linked pith:GMLLORU5 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Oft-cited causes of mini-flash crashes include human errors, endogenous feedback loops, the nature of modern liquidity provision, fundamental value shocks, and market fragmentation. We develop a mathematical model which captures aspects of the first three explanations. Empirical features of recent mini-flash crashes are present in our framework. For example, there are periods when no such events will occur. If they do, even just before their onset, market participants may not know with certainty that a disruption will unfold. Our mini-flash crashes can materialize in both low and high trading volume environments and may be accompanied by a partial synchronization in order submission. Instead of adopting a classically-inspired equilibrium approach, we borrow ideas from the optimal execution literature. Each of our agents begins with beliefs about how his own trades impact prices and how prices would move in his absence. They, along with other market participants, then submit orders which are executed at a common venue. Naturally, this leads us to explicitly distinguish between how prices actually evolve and our agents' opinions. In particular, every agent's beliefs will be expressly incorrect.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.