pith. sign in

arxiv: 1706.01703 · v1 · pith:QR7OZ2QInew · submitted 2017-06-06 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Analytical lower bounds for the size of elementary trapping sets of variable-regular LDPC codes with any girth and irregular ones with girth 8

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords girthldpccodesvariable-regularboundslowersizebelonging
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we give lower bounds on the size of $(a,b)$ elementary trapping sets (ETSs) belonging to variable-regular LDPC codes with any girth, $g$, and irregular ones with girth 8, where $a$ is the size, $b$ is the number of degree-one check nodes and satisfy the inequality $\frac{b}{a}<1$. Our proposed lower bounds are analytical, rather than exhaustive search-based, and based on graph theories. The numerical results in the literarture for $g=6,8$ for variable-regular LDPC codes match our results. Some of our investigations are independent of the girth and rely on the variables $a$, $b$ and $\gamma$, the column weight value, only. We prove that for an ETS belonging to a variable-regular LDPC code with girth 8 we have $a\geq2\gamma-1$ and $b\geq\gamma$. We demonstrate that these lower bounds are tight, making use of them we provide a method to achieve the minimum size of ETSs belonging to irregular LDPC codes with girth 8 specially those whose column weight values are a subset of $\{2,3,4,5,6\}$. Moreover, we show for variable-regular LDPC codes with girth 10, $a\geq(\gamma-1)^2+1$. And for $\gamma=3,4$ we obtain $a\geq7$ and $a\geq12$, respectively. Finally, for variable-regular LDPC codes with girths $g=2(2k+1)$ and $g=2(2k+2)$ we obtain $a\geq(\gamma-2)^k+1$ and $a\geq2(\gamma-2)^k+1$, respectively.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.