pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1707.00603 · v2 · pith:3ZTOOSYXnew · submitted 2017-07-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Bayesian Evidences for Dark Energy models in light of current obsevational data

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords modelsdarkenergyevidencesmeasurementscompareddifferentfield
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We do a comprehensive study of the Bayesian evidences for a large number of dark energy models using a combination of latest cosmological data from SNIa, CMB, BAO, Strong lensing time delay, Growth measurements, measurements of Hubble parameter at different redshifts and measurements of angular diameter distance by Megamaser Cosmology Project . We consider a variety of scalar field models with different potentials as well as different parametrisations for the dark energy equation of state. Among 21 models that we consider in our study, we do not find strong evidences in favour of any evolving dark energy model compared to $\Lambda$CDM. For the evolving dark energy models, we show that purely non-phantom models have much better evidences compared to those models that allow both phantom and non-phantom behaviours. Canonical scalar field with exponential and tachyon field with square potential have highest evidences among all the models considered in this work. We also show that a combination of low redshift measurements decisively favours an accelerating $\Lambda$CDM model compared to a non-accelerating power law model.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.