pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1707.06960 · v2 · submitted 2017-07-21 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords bellincompatibilitymathcalquantumimplymeasurementnonlocalitypovms
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we present explicitly a given a set of non jointly measurable POVMs $\mathcal{M}_A$ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses $\mathcal{M}_A$, then for any possible shared entangled state $\rho$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs $\mathcal{N}_B$ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model, and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.