pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1711.05591 · v2 · submitted 2017-11-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: unknown

Reply to "Comment on "Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment""

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords bagcicommentdistributionoikonomouphysreplytsallisapply
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)] on our paper [Plastino et al., Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.