Bayesian model checking: A comparison of tests
classification
🌌 astro-ph.IM
stat.ME
keywords
p-valuesposteriorbayesiancheckingpredictiveagreecloselycompared
read the original abstract
Two procedures for checking Bayesian models are compared using a simple test problem based on the local Hubble expansion. Over four orders of magnitude, p-values derived from a global goodness-of-fit criterion for posterior probability density functions (Lucy 2017) agree closely with posterior predictive p-values. The former can therefore serve as an effective proxy for the difficult-to-calculate posterior predictive p-values.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.