pith. sign in

arxiv: 1712.07422 · v1 · pith:M2LITZUDnew · submitted 2017-12-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · stat.ME

Bayesian model checking: A comparison of tests

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM stat.ME
keywords p-valuesposteriorbayesiancheckingpredictiveagreecloselycompared
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Two procedures for checking Bayesian models are compared using a simple test problem based on the local Hubble expansion. Over four orders of magnitude, p-values derived from a global goodness-of-fit criterion for posterior probability density functions (Lucy 2017) agree closely with posterior predictive p-values. The former can therefore serve as an effective proxy for the difficult-to-calculate posterior predictive p-values.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.