Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.09846 v2 pith:2QSAZT3C submitted 2018-05-24 eess.IV

X-ray tomography of extended objects: a comparison of data acquisition approaches

classification eess.IV
keywords datainvolvesstitchingtomographyacquisitionalignmentapproacheshowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The penetration power of x-rays allows one to image large objects. For example, centimeter-sized specimens can be imaged with micron-level resolution using synchrotron sources. In this case, however, the limited beam diameter and detector size preclude the acquisition of the full sample in a single take, necessitating strategies for combining data from multiple regions. Object stitching involves the combination of local tomography data from overlapping regions, while projection stitching involves the collection of projections at multiple offset positions from the rotation axis followed by data merging and reconstruction. We compare these two approaches in terms of radiation dose applied to the specimen, and reconstructed image quality. Object stitching involves an easier data alignment problem, and immediate viewing of subregions before the entire dataset has been acquired. Projection stitching is more dose-efficient, and avoids certain artifacts of local tomography; however, it also involves a more difficult data assembly and alignment procedure, in that it is more sensitive to accumulative registration error.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.