pith. sign in

arxiv: 1806.08777 · v1 · pith:PJBYVQHOnew · submitted 2018-06-22 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Wireless Channel Dynamics and Robustness for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords wirelesschannelmodelcharacteristicscommunicationfadingfindrobust
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Interactive, immersive and critical applications demand ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC). To build wireless communication systems that can support these applications, understanding the characteristics of the wireless medium is paramount. Although wireless channel characteristics and dynamics have been extensively studied, it is important to revisit these concepts in the context of the strict demands of low latency and ultra-reliability. In this paper, we bring a modeling approach from robust control to wireless communication -- the wireless channel characteristics are given a nominal model around which we allow for some quantified uncertainty. We propose certain key "directions" along which to bound model uncertainty that are relevant to URLLC. For the nominal model, we take an in-depth look at wireless channel characteristics such as spatial and temporal correlations based on Jakes' model. Contrary to what has been claimed in the literature, we find that standard Rayleigh fading processes are not bandlimited. This has significant implications on the predictability of channels. We also find that under reasonable conditions the spatial correlation of channels provide a fading distribution that is not too far off from an independent spatial fading model. Additionally, we look at the impact of these channel models on cooperative communication based systems. We find that while spatial-diversity-based techniques are necessary to combat the adverse effects of fading, time-diversity-based techniques are necessary to be robust against unmodeled errors. Robust URLLC systems need to operate with both an SNR margin and a time/repetition margin.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-Cell Sparse Activity Detection for Massive Random Access: Massive MIMO versus Cooperative MIMO

    cs.IT 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Massive MIMO drives detection error to zero with more antennas while cooperative MIMO improves cell-edge performance, with three cooperating BSs matching four times the antennas in massive MIMO for cell-edge reliability.