Reply to "Comment on `No evidence for orbital loop currents in charge-ordered YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+x}$ from polarized neutron diffraction' "

D. A. Bonn; E. Blackburn; J. Kulda; Ruixing Liang; S. M. Hayden; T. P. Croft; W. N Hardy

arxiv: 1807.06250 · v1 · pith:6THJK4F4new · submitted 2018-07-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Reply to "Comment on `No evidence for orbital loop currents in charge-ordered YBa₂Cu₃O_(6+x) from polarized neutron diffraction' "

T. P. Croft , E. Blackburn , J. Kulda , Ruixing Liang , D. A. Bonn , W. N Hardy , S. M. Hayden This is my paper

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords commentdiffractionneutronpolarizedarxivbeambourgescaused

0 comments

read the original abstract

The issues raised in the preceding comment of Bourges et al. [arXiv:1710.08173, Phys. Rev. B 98, 016501 (2018)] are shown to be unfounded. We highlight the complications caused by inhomogeneous beam polarization that can occur when using polarized neutron diffraction to detect small magnetic moments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

Reply to "Comment on `No evidence for orbital loop currents in charge-ordered YBa₂Cu₃O_(6+x) from polarized neutron diffraction' "

discussion (0)