pith. sign in

arxiv: 1808.05300 · v2 · pith:KII5QHC6new · submitted 2018-08-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · quant-ph

Classification of subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el quant-ph
keywords subsystemstrongmathcalphasessptstopologicalclassificationequivalence
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases in 2D protected by linear subsystem symmetries, i.e. those that act along rigid lines. There is a distinction between a "strong" subsystem SPT phase, and a "weak" one, which is composed of decoupled 1D SPTs with global symmetries. We propose a natural definition for strong equivalence of such phases, in terms of a linearly-symmetric local unitary transformation, under which a weak subsystem SPT is equivalent to the trivial phase. This leads to a number of distinct equivalence classes of strong subsystem SPTs, which we show are in one-to-one correspondence with elements of the group $\mathcal{C}[G_s] = \mathcal{H}^{2}[G_s^2,U(1)]/(\mathcal{H}^{2}[G_s,U(1)])^3$, where $G_s$ is the finite abelian onsite symmetry group. We also show that strong subsystem SPTs by our classification necessarily exhibit a spurious topological entanglement entropy on a cylinder.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond

    hep-th 2022-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review summarizes transformative examples of generalized symmetries in QFT and their applications to anomalies and dynamics.