pith. sign in

arxiv: 1809.00042 · v1 · pith:ZKJUJ3VXnew · submitted 2018-08-31 · 💻 cs.CL

What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords dependenciesfiller-gaplearnmodelslanguagernnsstate-of-the-artsyntactic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

RNN language models have achieved state-of-the-art perplexity results and have proven useful in a suite of NLP tasks, but it is as yet unclear what syntactic generalizations they learn. Here we investigate whether state-of-the-art RNN language models represent long-distance filler-gap dependencies and constraints on them. Examining RNN behavior on experimentally controlled sentences designed to expose filler-gap dependencies, we show that RNNs can represent the relationship in multiple syntactic positions and over large spans of text. Furthermore, we show that RNNs learn a subset of the known restrictions on filler-gap dependencies, known as island constraints: RNNs show evidence for wh-islands, adjunct islands, and complex NP islands. These studies demonstrates that state-of-the-art RNN models are able to learn and generalize about empty syntactic positions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.