Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the interactions of Ti${_2}$AlC, Ti${_3}$AlC${_2}$, Ti${_3}$SiC${_2}$ and Cr${_2}$AlC with palladium at 900 {\deg}C

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.00098 v1 pith:WFPP4G44 submitted 2018-10-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords diffusioncoupleswerepalladiumreactionresistantx-raya-group
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Herein we report on the reactivity between palladium, Pd, and the MAX phases, Ti${_2}$AlC, Ti${_3}$AlC${_2}$, Ti${_3}$SiC${_2}$ and Cr${_2}$AlC. Diffusion couples of Pd/MAX were heated to 900 {\deg}C under uniaxial stress of ~20 MPa for 2, 4, and 10 h in a vacuum (<1 Pa) hot press. The diffusion couples were examined using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. After heating to 900 {\deg}C for 10 h, the diffusion layer thicknesses in the Ti${_2}$AlC/Pd, Cr${_2}$AlC/Pd, Ti${_3}$AlC${_2}$/Pd and Ti${_3}$SiC${_2}$/Pd couples were found to be 35, 45, 105 and 410 mm, respectively. Thus, Ti${_2}$AlC is the most resistant to reaction, while Ti${_3}$SiC${_2}$ is least resistant, with Cr${_2}$AlC and Ti${_3}$AlC${_2}$, in between. In all cases, the reaction occurred by the diffusion of the A-group element into Pd, concomitant with Pd diffusion into the MAX phase. No diffusion of the M and X atoms was detected.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools