On the impact of pull request decisions on future contributions
read the original abstract
The pull-based development process has become prevalent on platforms such as GitHub as a form of distributed software development. Potential contributors can create and submit a set of changes to a software project through pull requests. These changes can be accepted, discussed or rejected by the maintainers of the software project, and can influence further contribution proposals. As such, it is important to examine the practices that encourage contributors to a project to submit pull requests. Specifically, we consider the impact of prior pull requests on the acceptance or rejection of subsequent pull requests. We also consider the potential effect of rejecting or ignoring pull requests on further contributions. In this preliminary research, we study three large projects on \textsf{GitHub}, using pull request data obtained through the \textsf{GitHub} API, and we perform empirical analyses to investigate the above questions. Our results show that continued contribution to a project is correlated with higher pull request acceptance rates and that pull request rejections lead to fewer future contributions.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Do Good, Stay Longer? Temporal Patterns and Predictors of Newcomer-to-Core Transitions in Conventional OSS and OSS4SG
OSS4SG projects retain contributors at 2.2X higher rates with 19.6% higher core status probability than conventional OSS, and a late-spike temporal pattern enables faster core achievement (21 weeks) than early intensi...
-
PatchTrack: A Comprehensive Analysis of ChatGPT's Influence on Pull Request Outcomes
Empirical analysis of 338 PRs with self-admitted ChatGPT usage shows low full integration (median 25%), selective adaptation patterns, and broader influence on developer reasoning during reviews.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.