Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The triangle groups (2,4,5) and (2,5,5) are not systolic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.08567 v2 pith:TDLMYKQN submitted 2018-12-20 math.GR math.CO

The triangle groups (2,4,5) and (2,5,5) are not systolic

classification math.GR math.CO
keywords groupssystolictrianglealongcomplexesexampleshyperbolicinvolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

In this paper we provide new examples of hyperbolic but nonsystolic groups by showing that the triangle groups $(2,4,5)$ and $(2,5,5)$ are not systolic. Along the way we prove some results about subsets of systolic complexes stable under involutions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Weak Modularity and $\widetilde{A}_n$ Buildings

    math.GR 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proves geometric actions on weakly modular graphs for tilde A_n Coxeter groups via canonical embeddings into R^{n+1} and extends the result to tilde A_3 buildings.