Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimal False Discovery Control of Minimax Estimator

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.10013 v3 pith:4AN4NUT2 submitted 2018-12-25 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords ratecontrolestimationfalsediscoveryselectionbeenbehavior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Two major research tasks lie at the heart of high dimensional data analysis: accurate parameter estimation and correct support recovery. The existing literature mostly aims for either the best parameter estimation or the best model selection result, however little has been done to understand the potential interaction between the estimation precision and the selection behavior. In this work, our minimax result shows that an estimator's performance of type I error control directly links with its $L_2$ estimation error rate, and reveals a trade-off phenomenon between the rate of convergence and the false discovery control: to achieve better accuracy, one risks yielding more false discoveries. In particular, we characterize the false discovery control behavior of rate optimal and rate suboptimal estimators under different sparsity regimes, and discover a rigid dichotomy between these two estimators under near-linear and linear sparsity settings. In addition, this work provides a rigorous explanation to the incompatibility phenomenon between selection consistency and rate minimaxity which has been frequently observed in the high dimensional literature.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools