Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Expected Accuracy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.00448 v1 pith:FXBYNXIV submitted 2019-05-01 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords accuracyclassificationcrossentropyexpectednegativetaggingtasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We empirically investigate the (negative) expected accuracy as an alternative loss function to cross entropy (negative log likelihood) for classification tasks. Coupled with softmax activation, it has small derivatives over most of its domain, and is therefore hard to optimize. A modified, leaky version is evaluated on a variety of classification tasks, including digit recognition, image classification, sequence tagging and tree tagging, using a variety of neural architectures such as logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, CNN, LSTM and Tree-LSTM. We show that it yields comparable or better accuracy compared to cross entropy. Furthermore, the proposed objective is shown to be more robust to label noise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools