pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.06070 · v1 · pith:NFZAFNTLnew · submitted 2019-06-14 · 🧮 math.CO · cs.IT· math.IT

Complexity of Dependencies in Bounded Domains, Armstrong Codes, and Generalizations

classification 🧮 math.CO cs.ITmath.IT
keywords armstrongcodescodedependenciesboundeddomainslengthmaximum
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The study of Armstrong codes is motivated by the problem of understanding complexities of dependencies in relational database systems, where attributes have bounded domains. A $(q,k,n)$-Armstrong code is a $q$-ary code of length $n$ with minimum Hamming distance $n-k+1$, and for any set of $k-1$ coordinates there exist two codewords that agree exactly there. Let $f(q,k)$ be the maximum $n$ for which such a code exists. In this paper, $f(q,3)=3q-1$ is determined for all $q\geq 5$ with three possible exceptions. This disproves a conjecture of Sali. Further, we introduce generalized Armstrong codes for branching, or $(s,t)$-dependencies, construct several classes of optimal Armstrong codes and establish lower bounds for the maximum length $n$ in this more general setting.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.