pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09120 · v2 · pith:UDTOFCMDnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · physics.class-ph· physics.optics

Light propagation in systems involving two-dimensional atomic lattices

Juha Javanainen , Renuka Rajapakse This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph physics.class-phphysics.optics
keywords 2D atomic latticedipole-dipole interactionlight propagationresonance shift1D waveguide emulationanisotropic polarizabilityoptical response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stacks of 2D atomic lattices emulate regularly spaced atoms in a lossless 1D waveguide and cancel resonance shifts in 3D lattices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the optical response of a 2D square lattice of atoms using classical electrodynamics, where dipole-dipole interactions cause the lattice to polarize with cooperatively shifted resonances and altered linewidths. It establishes that when two such lattices are far enough apart and Bragg reflections are absent, they interact by radiating plane waves whose amplitude matches that from a continuous dipole distribution in the plane. These results are used to model light propagation through stacks of 2D lattices by drawing on pictures of 2D lattice response and 1D waveguide propagation. The analysis shows that a stack can emulate regularly spaced atoms in a lossless 1D waveguide. In suitable geometries, resonance shifts typical of 1D and 2D structures cancel, eliminating density-dependent shifts for atoms in a 3D lattice; anisotropic polarizability further yields frequencies of complete transparency or opacity.

Core claim

A stack of 2D lattices may emulate regularly spaced atoms in a lossless 1D waveguide, and in a suitable geometry the resonance shifts characteristic of 1D and 2D lattice structures may completely cancel to eliminate density dependent resonance shifts of atoms bound to a 3D lattice. A generalization to the case of anisotropic polarizability reveals light frequencies for which the lattice is either completely transparent or completely opaque.

What carries the argument

Plane-wave interaction between separated 2D lattices matching radiation from a continuous dipole distribution in the lattice plane.

If this is right

  • A stack of 2D lattices emulates regularly spaced atoms in a lossless 1D waveguide.
  • Resonance shifts characteristic of 1D and 2D lattice structures can completely cancel.
  • Density dependent resonance shifts are eliminated for atoms bound to a 3D lattice.
  • Anisotropic polarizability produces light frequencies at which the lattice is completely transparent or completely opaque.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cancellation of shifts could allow construction of 3D optical lattices whose response is independent of atom density.
  • The plane-wave equivalence might extend to predict propagation in other hybrid low-dimensional atomic arrays.
  • Experiments with anisotropic atoms in magnetic fields could directly test the predicted transparency and opacity frequencies.

Load-bearing premise

When the distance between two 2D lattices is large enough and Bragg reflections are absent, the lattices interact as if they radiated a plane wave whose amplitude matches radiation from a dipole moment continuously distributed in the lattice plane.

What would settle it

Measurement of resonance frequency versus density in a stacked 3D lattice at the geometry where 1D and 2D shifts are predicted to cancel, showing no net density-dependent shift.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09120 by Juha Javanainen, Renuka Rajapakse.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Real (dashed blue line) and imaginary (solid red line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Top: 3D plot of the absolute value of the ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Power transmission coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Power transmission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Damping rates (top) and resonance shifts (bottom) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Reflection coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Total density shift of resonance in a 3D lattice as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Reflection coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The real part of the elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Line shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the optical response of a 2D square lattice of atoms using classical electrodynamics. Due to dipole-dipole interactions, the lattice atoms polarize as if the lattice were an atom with up to three resonance frequencies, with cooperatively shifted resonances and altered transition linewidths. We show that when the distance between two 2D lattices is large enough and Bragg reflections are absent, the lattices interact among themselves as if they radiated a plane wave whose amplitude is in accordance with the radiation from a dipole moment continuously distributed in the lattice plane. We employ these results to study light propagation in stacks of 2D lattices, drawing on simple qualitative pictures of the response of a 2D lattice and light propagation in 1D waveguides. We show that a stack of 2D lattices may emulate regularly spaced atoms in a lossless 1D waveguide, and argue that in a suitable geometry the resonance shifts characteristic of 1D and 2D lattice structures may completely cancel to eliminate density dependent resonance shifts of atoms bound to a 3D lattice. A generalization to the case of anisotropic polarizability, such as in the presence of a magnetic field, reveals light frequencies induced by the magnetic field for which the lattice is either completely transparent, or completely opaque.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies classical electrodynamics to a 2D square lattice of atoms, showing that dipole-dipole interactions cause the lattice to respond with up to three cooperatively shifted resonances and modified linewidths. It establishes that, for sufficiently large separation and in the absence of Bragg reflections, two such lattices couple exactly as continuous dipole sheets radiating plane waves. These results are used to argue that stacks of 2D lattices can emulate regularly spaced atoms in a lossless 1D waveguide and that a suitable 3D geometry can cancel the density-dependent resonance shifts characteristic of 1D and 2D lattices. A generalization to anisotropic polarizability identifies frequencies at which the lattice is fully transparent or fully opaque.

Significance. If the central approximation holds with the claimed precision, the work supplies a transparent analytic framework for light propagation through atomic lattices and a concrete route to nulling density-dependent shifts in 3D systems. The 1D-emulation picture and the transparency/opacity conditions are potentially useful for designing lattice-based quantum optics experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Interaction between two 2D lattices] The section on interaction between two 2D lattices asserts that, for large enough separation and absent Bragg reflections, each lattice radiates exactly as a continuous dipole sheet whose amplitude matches the integrated polarization. No estimate is given for the size of corrections arising from the discrete lattice sum, finite polarizability tensor, or residual evanescent components. Because this equivalence is used without qualification to derive the 1D-waveguide emulation and the exact cancellation of 1D+2D shifts, the absence of a quantitative error bound makes the cancellation claim load-bearing and unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §2] The abstract and main text refer to “up to three resonance frequencies” without an explicit statement of the lattice symmetry or the polarizability tensor components that produce this multiplicity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. Below we respond point-by-point to the single major comment. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate an explicit discussion of the error terms.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section on interaction between two 2D lattices asserts that, for large enough separation and absent Bragg reflections, each lattice radiates exactly as a continuous dipole sheet whose amplitude matches the integrated polarization. No estimate is given for the size of corrections arising from the discrete lattice sum, finite polarizability tensor, or residual evanescent components. Because this equivalence is used without qualification to derive the 1D-waveguide emulation and the exact cancellation of 1D+2D shifts, the absence of a quantitative error bound makes the cancellation claim load-bearing and unverified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The equivalence follows from the far-field radiation of a periodic array: when Bragg reflections are absent, all non-zero reciprocal-lattice components of the dipole sum produce only evanescent fields that decay exponentially with distance from the plane, leaving a propagating plane wave whose amplitude is fixed by the spatially averaged polarization. The self-consistent solution already incorporates the full (possibly anisotropic) polarizability tensor. We nevertheless agree that an explicit bound on the size of the residual corrections for finite but large separation strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added a short paragraph that estimates these corrections: the leading evanescent contribution falls as exp(−2π d/a) (d = inter-lattice distance, a = lattice constant) while the discrete-to-continuous difference in the propagating component is O((ka)^2) for ka ≪ 1. These scalings justify applying the continuous-sheet limit to the 1D-emulation and shift-cancellation arguments, which remain exact inside the stated regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation applies standard electrodynamics to lattice geometry

full rationale

The paper presents the continuous-dipole-sheet equivalence for distant 2D lattices (absent Bragg reflections) as a derived result from classical electrodynamics, not as a definition or fitted input. Subsequent applications to 1D emulation and resonance-shift cancellation are obtained by combining this result with qualitative waveguide pictures; no equations reduce the claimed outcomes to input parameters by construction, and no self-citations or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. The central claims therefore remain independent of the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of classical electrodynamics to the polarization and propagation problem together with the continuous-dipole approximation for separated lattices; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Classical electrodynamics governs the optical response of the atomic lattices.
    The abstract opens with 'using classical electrodynamics'.
  • domain assumption Dipole-dipole interactions are the dominant mechanism producing collective polarization.
    The abstract states that 'due to dipole-dipole interactions, the lattice atoms polarize as if the lattice were an atom with up to three resonance frequencies'.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5756 in / 1540 out tokens · 34959 ms · 2026-05-25T18:28:07.619454+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Software Atom

    4 π (θ = 0 means perpendicular incidence and θ = 0. 5 π would be light coming in along the lattice plane), and the projection of the wave vector onto the lattice plane makes the angle φ = 0. 125 π with the x axis, i.e., bisects the an- gle between the x axis and the direction that, in turn, bisects the angle between the x and y axes. The polar- ization of...

    work page

  2. [2]

    55 × 2π in Fig

    537 × 2π (compare with the lattice spacing 0 . 55 × 2π in Fig. 9) such a confluence of the resonances in fact occurs. VII. DISCUSSION We have investigated the optical response of atoms bound to a 2D lattice, allowing for non-normal incidence and anisotropic polarizability that occurs when a mag- netic field is present. We have also explicitly looked into th...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We wish to have auto- mated control of the limits, given a prescribed goal for precision

    Richardson extrapolation In the computations of the self-sum and the transfer sum we have to do two limits. We wish to have auto- mated control of the limits, given a prescribed goal for precision. This is a fairly demanding problem in numer- ical analysis. Here we describe our solution. By symmetry, the sum in (7) can be carried out in the first quadrant ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The 17 integral over the angles is easy to carry out analytically using Mathe matica

    Transfer matrix As to the long-distance analytical form of the transfer matrix, (3 8) and (39), we firstly without further ado replace the sum (36) with an integral over the site index n, and express it in terms of polar coordinates in the plane. The 17 integral over the angles is easy to carry out analytically using Mathe matica. We choose the propagation...

    work page

  5. [5]

    resonance approximation

    6%, is probably fortuitous, but it lends credence to our methods. Representative results are shown in Fig. 11, which plots the shift divided by the filling factor, s/ζ , as a function s/ζ × × × × ×   ζ FIG. 11. Line shift s divided by the filling factor ζ as a func- tion of the filling factor ζ, with statistical standard deviations. Black filled circles: R ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Up to the point when all results are put to- gether, we deal with the tensor A

    Write the polarizability tensor in the form A = A/ω . Up to the point when all results are put to- gether, we deal with the tensor A. Compare this with the standard undergraduate exercise, in which one would make the resonance approximation by writing the resonance denominator as ω 2 − ω 2 0 = (ω − ω 0)(ω + ω 0) ≃ 2ω ∆. We are getting ahead of things here...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Write the tensor A in terms of ω 0 and ω = ω 0 + ∆

    work page

  8. [8]

    Expand all components of the tensor A as partial fractions with the first power of ∆ in the denomi- nators, zeroth power in the numerators

    work page

  9. [9]

    Replace each partial fraction with the leading term in its expansion in the limit ω 0 → ∞

    work page

  10. [10]

    Soft- ware Atom

    Keep only the partial fractions that are of the dom- inant, zeroth, order in ω 0. This approximation produces terms with resonance de- nominators of the form ∆ + iγ and ∆ ± ΩB + iγ, where ΩB = qB/ 2m is half of the cyclotron frequency for the given magnetic field B. Finally, we compare these results in the case of zero magnetic field with the expression (3)...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Cooperative Lamb shift in an atomic vapor layer of nanometer thickness,

    J. Keaveney, A. Sargsyan, U. Krohn, I. G. Hughes, D. Sarkisyan, and C. S. Adams, “Cooperative Lamb shift in an atomic vapor layer of nanometer thickness,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 173601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Observation of suppression of light scattering induced by dipole-dipole interactions in a cold-atom ensemble,

    J. Pellegrino, R. Bourgain, S. Jennewein, Y. R. P. Sor- tais, A. Browaeys, S. D. Jenkins, and J. Ruostekoski, “Observation of suppression of light scattering induced by dipole-dipole interactions in a cold-atom ensemble,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 133602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Cooperative emission of a pulse train in an optically thick scattering medium,

    C. C. Kwong, T. Yang, D. Delande, R. Pier- rat, and D. Wilkowski, “Cooperative emission of a pulse train in an optically thick scattering medium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 223601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Collective atomic scattering and motional effects in a dense coher- ent medium,

    S. L. Bromley, B. Zhu, M. Bishof, X. Zhang, T. Both- well, J. Schachenmayer, T. L. Nicholson, R. Kaiser, S. F. Yelin, M. D. Lukin, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, “Collective atomic scattering and motional effects in a dense coher- ent medium,” Nat Commun 7, 11039 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Subradiance in a large cloud of cold atoms,

    William Guerin, Michelle O. Ara´ ujo, and Robin Kaiser, “Subradiance in a large cloud of cold atoms,” 20 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 083601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Coherent scattering of near- resonant light by a dense microscopic cold atomic cloud,

    S. Jennewein, M. Besbes, N. J. Schilder, S. D. Jenkins, C. Sauvan, J. Ruostekoski, J.-J. Greffet, Y. R. P. Sor- tais, and A. Browaeys, “Coherent scattering of near- resonant light by a dense microscopic cold atomic cloud,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 233601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Observation of single-photon superradiance and the co- operative Lamb shift in an extended sample of cold atoms,

    S. J. Roof, K. J. Kemp, M. D. Havey, and I. M. Sokolov, “Observation of single-photon superradiance and the co- operative Lamb shift in an extended sample of cold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 073003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Transmission of near- resonant light through a dense slab of cold atoms,

    L. Corman, J. L. Ville, R. Saint-Jalm, M. Aidels- burger, T. Bienaim´ e, S. Nascimb` ene, J. Dal- ibard, and J. Beugnon, “Transmission of near- resonant light through a dense slab of cold atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 053629 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    One-dimensional mod- elling of light propagation in dense and degenerate sam- ples,

    Juha Javanainen, Janne Ruostekoski, Bjarne Vester- gaard, and Matthew R. Francis, “One-dimensional mod- elling of light propagation in dense and degenerate sam- ples,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 649–666 (1999)

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Absorption imaging of a quasi- two-dimensional gas: a multiple scattering analysis,

    L Chomaz, L Corman, T Yefsah, R Desbuquois, and J Dalibard, “Absorption imaging of a quasi- two-dimensional gas: a multiple scattering analysis,” New Journal of Physics 14, 055001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Cooperativity in light scattering by cold atoms,

    N. Piovella T. Bienaim´ e, R. Bachelard and R. Kaiser, “Cooperativity in light scattering by cold atoms,” Fortschr. Phys. 61, 377 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Shifts of a resonance line in a dense atomic sample,

    Juha Javanainen, Janne Ruostekoski, Yi Li, and Sung- Mi Yoo, “Shifts of a resonance line in a dense atomic sample,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 113603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Collec- tive dipole-dipole interactions in an atomic array,

    R. T. Sutherland and F. Robicheaux, “Collec- tive dipole-dipole interactions in an atomic array,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 013847 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Light scattering from dense cold atomic media,

    Bihui Zhu, John Cooper, Jun Ye, and Ana Maria Rey, “Light scattering from dense cold atomic media,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 023612 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Exact electrodynamics versus standard optics for a slab of cold dense gas,

    Juha Javanainen, Janne Ruostekoski, Yi Li, and Sung-Mi Yoo, “Exact electrodynamics versus standard optics for a slab of cold dense gas,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 033835 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    (Wiley, New York, 1999)

    John David Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999)

    Max Born and Emil Wolf, Principles of Optics , 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999)

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    Light propa- gation beyond the mean-field theory of standard optics,

    Juha Javanainen and Janne Ruostekoski, “Light propa- gation beyond the mean-field theory of standard optics,” Opt. Express 24, 993–1001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Controlled manipulation of light by cooperative response of atoms in an optical lattice,

    Stewart D. Jenkins and Janne Ruostekoski, “Controlled manipulation of light by cooperative response of atoms in an optical lattice,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 031602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Enhanced optical cross section via collec- tive coupling of atomic dipoles in a 2D array,

    Robert J. Bettles, Simon A. Gardiner, and Charles S. Adams, “Enhanced optical cross section via collec- tive coupling of atomic dipoles in a 2D array,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 103602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Cooperative optical response of 2D dense lattices with strongly correlated dipoles,

    Sung-Mi Yoo and Sun Mok Paik, “Cooperative optical response of 2D dense lattices with strongly correlated dipoles,” Opt. Express 24, 2156–2165 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Sto r- ing light with subradiant correlations in arrays of atoms,

    G. Facchinetti, S. D. Jenkins, and J. Ruostekoski, “Sto r- ing light with subradiant correlations in arrays of atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 243601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Interaction of light with planar lattices of atoms: Reflec- tion, transmission, and cooperative magnetometry,

    G. Facchinetti and J. Ruostekoski, “Interaction of light with planar lattices of atoms: Reflec- tion, transmission, and cooperative magnetometry,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 023833 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Cooperative resonances in light scattering from two-dimensional atomic arrays,

    Ephraim Shahmoon, Dominik S. Wild, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Susanne F. Yelin, “Cooperative resonances in light scattering from two-dimensional atomic arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 113601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Topologi- cal quantum optics in two-dimensional atomic arrays,

    J. Perczel, J. Borregaard, D. E. Chang, H. Pichler, S. F. Yelin, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, “Topologi- cal quantum optics in two-dimensional atomic arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023603 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Pho- tonic band structure of two-dimensional atomic lattices,

    J. Perczel, J. Borregaard, D. E. Chang, H. Pich- ler, S. F. Yelin, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, “Pho- tonic band structure of two-dimensional atomic lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 063801 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Exponential im- provement in photon storage fidelities using subra- diance and “selective radiance

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, “Exponential im- provement in photon storage fidelities using subra- diance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 031024 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Topolog- ical properties of a dense atomic lattice gas,

    Robert J. Bettles, Jiˇ r ´ ı Min´ aˇ r, Charles S. Adams, Igor Lesanovsky, and Beatriz Olmos, “Topolog- ical properties of a dense atomic lattice gas,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 041603 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Strongly coupled cold atoms in bilayer dense lattices,

    Sung-Mi Yoo, “Strongly coupled cold atoms in bilayer dense lattices,” New Journal of Physics 20, 083012 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Metamaterial trans- parency induced by cooperative electromagnetic interac- tions,

    S. D. Jenkins and J. Ruostekoski, “Metamaterial trans- parency induced by cooperative electromagnetic interac- tions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 147401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Many-body subradiant excitations in metamaterial arrays: Experiment and theory,

    Stewart D. Jenkins, Janne Ruostekoski, Nikitas Papasimakis, Salvatore Savo, and Nikolay I. Zheludev, “Many-body subradiant excitations in metamaterial arrays: Experiment and theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 053901 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Photonic band gaps in optical lattices,

    I. H. Deutsch, R. J. C. Spreeuw, S. L. Rolston, and W. D. Phillips, “Photonic band gaps in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 1394–1410 (1995)

    work page 1995

  43. [43]

    Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,

    Fam Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 063403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Optical inter- face created by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field surrounding an optical nanofiber,

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagu´ e, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Optical inter- face created by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field surrounding an optical nanofiber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203603 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Nanopho- tonic quantum phase switch with a single atom,

    T. G. Tiecke, J. D. Thompson, N. P. de Leon, L. R. Liu, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, “Nanopho- tonic quantum phase switch with a single atom,” Nature 508, 241 EP – (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Atom–light interactions in photonic crystals,

    A. Goban, C. L. Hung, S. P. Yu, J. D. Hood, J. A. Muniz, J. H. Lee, M. J. Martin, A. C. McClung, K. S. Choi, D. E. Chang, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, “Atom–light interactions in photonic crystals,” Nat Commun 5, 3808 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals,

    J. S. Douglas, H. Habibian, C. L. Hung, A. V. Gorshkov, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, “Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals,” Nat. Photon. 9, 326–331 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide,

    A. Goban, C.-L. Hung, J. D. Hood, S.-P. Yu, J. A. Muniz, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, “Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 063601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Coherent backscattering of light off one-dimensional atomic strings,

    H. L. Sørensen, J.-B. B´ eguin, K. W. Kluge, I. Iakoupov, A. S. Sørensen, J. H. M¨ uller, E. S. Polzik, and J. Ap- pel, “Coherent backscattering of light off one-dimensional atomic strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 133604 (2016). 21

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Large Bragg reflection from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms near a nanoscale waveguide,

    Neil V. Corzo, Baptiste Gouraud, Aveek Chan- dra, Akihisa Goban, Alexandra S. Sheremet, Dmitriy V. Kupriyanov, and Julien Laurat, “Large Bragg reflection from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms near a nanoscale waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 133603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Emer- gence of correlated optics in one-dimensional waveg- uides for classical and quantum atomic gases,

    Janne Ruostekoski and Juha Javanainen, “Emer- gence of correlated optics in one-dimensional waveg- uides for classical and quantum atomic gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Arrays of strongly coupled atoms in a one-dimensional waveguide,

    Janne Ruostekoski and Juha Javanainen, “Arrays of strongly coupled atoms in a one-dimensional waveguide,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 033857 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Controlling dipole-dipole frequency shifts in a lattice-based optical atomic clock,

    D. E. Chang, Jun Ye, and M. D. Lukin, “Controlling dipole-dipole frequency shifts in a lattice-based optical atomic clock,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 023810 (2004)

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    Quantum field theory of cooperative atom response: Low light inten- sity,

    Janne Ruostekoski and Juha Javanainen, “Quantum field theory of cooperative atom response: Low light inten- sity,” Phys. Rev. A 55, 513–526 (1997)

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolski, V. A. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The art of scientific com- puting, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, NY, 2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    There is a functionally equivalent figure in the Supple- mental Material of Ref. [24]

    work page

  57. [57]

    Collisional relaxation of atomic excited states, line broadening and interatomic interactions,

    E.L. Lewis, “Collisional relaxation of atomic excited states, line broadening and interatomic interactions,” Physics Reports 58, 1 – 71 (1980)

    work page 1980

  58. [58]

    The Software Atom,

    Juha Javanainen, “The Software Atom,” Computer Physics Communications 212, 1 – 7 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Polarium model: Coherent radiation by a resonant medium,

    Sudhakar Prasad and Roy J. Glauber, “Polarium model: Coherent radiation by a resonant medium,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 063814 (2000)

    work page 2000

  60. [60]

    Cooperative spontaneous emission of n atoms: Many-body eigenstates, the effect of virtual Lamb shift processes, and analogy with radiation of n classical oscil- lators,

    Anatoly A. Svidzinsky, Jun-Tao Chang, and Marlan O. Scully, “Cooperative spontaneous emission of n atoms: Many-body eigenstates, the effect of virtual Lamb shift processes, and analogy with radiation of n classical oscil- lators,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 053821 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Near-resonance light scatter- ing from a high-density ultracold atomic 87Rb gas,

    S. Balik, A. L. Win, M. D. Havey, I. M. Sokolov, and D. V. Kupriyanov, “Near-resonance light scatter- ing from a high-density ultracold atomic 87Rb gas,” Phys. Rev. A 87, 053817 (2013)

    work page 2013