pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09138 · v1 · pith:AIV2M4BNnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · ✦ hep-ph

QCD and High Energy Interactions: MORIOND 2019 Theory Summary

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords QCDStandard ModelBeyond the Standard ModelCollider phenomenologyHeavy ion collisionsPerturbative calculationsPrecision physicsB-factories
0
0 comments X

The pith

The paper summarizes recent theory developments in QCD relevant to precision SM studies and BSM searches at colliders and heavy ions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compiles highlights of recent theoretical work in QCD and high-energy interactions. These advances support more accurate Standard Model predictions and improved searches for physics beyond the Standard Model at the LHC, future pp and e+e- colliders, B-factories, and in selected heavy-ion studies. A sympathetic reader would value the overview because it identifies the calculations needed to match experimental precision and interpret data reliably. The summary spans perturbative techniques, resummation methods, and non-perturbative topics that directly affect phenomenology.

Core claim

The paper establishes that selected recent theoretical developments constitute the key advances for precision Standard Model studies and searches for Beyond-the-SM phenomena at present and future high-energy pp and e+e- colliders, B-factories, and selected heavy ion collision topics.

What carries the argument

The summary compilation of recent perturbative QCD calculations, higher-order corrections, and resummation techniques for collider observables.

If this is right

  • These theory advances enable tighter constraints on new physics from existing and upcoming collider data.
  • Improved precision calculations reduce theoretical uncertainties in SM background predictions at the LHC.
  • Developments in heavy-ion theory refine models of quark-gluon plasma dynamics and observables.
  • Progress at B-factories sharpens tests of flavor physics and CKM matrix elements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The summary could guide experimental collaborations in prioritizing which higher-order corrections to incorporate in analyses.
  • Tracking how these highlighted areas evolve in subsequent years would reveal the pace of progress in perturbative QCD.
  • Cross-connections between the collider and heavy-ion sections might suggest unified approaches to multi-scale QCD problems.

Load-bearing premise

The topics chosen for inclusion accurately reflect the most important or representative recent theoretical advances without major selection bias or omission of key work.

What would settle it

Demonstration that a major 2018-2019 theoretical advance in one of the covered QCD or collider areas was omitted or inaccurately presented would falsify the summary's completeness.

read the original abstract

Highlights of recent theory developments are summarized relevant to precision Standard Model (SM) studies and searches for Beyond-the-SM (BSM) phenomena at present and future high-energy pp and e+ e- colliders, and B-factories, as well as to selected topics in heavy ion collisions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a theory summary of the Moriond 2019 QCD and High Energy Interactions conference. It reports selected highlights of recent theoretical work on precision Standard Model calculations and Beyond-the-Standard-Model searches at present and future pp and e+e- colliders, B-factories, and selected heavy-ion topics.

Significance. Conference theory summaries fulfill a useful community service by providing a compact record of highlighted advances discussed at the meeting. When the selection is representative, the document serves as a reference point for ongoing work in collider phenomenology and QCD.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract lists the broad topics covered but does not indicate the approximate number of individual results or talks summarized; adding this information would help readers gauge the scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation to accept the manuscript. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Conference summary contains no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is a theory summary reporting highlights from Moriond 2019 talks on QCD and high-energy interactions. It presents no original derivations, equations, predictions, or fitted parameters of its own. All content references external work, so no load-bearing steps exist that could reduce by construction to self-citations, definitions, or inputs. This is a normal, self-contained summary format with no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced because the document is a review of existing work rather than a derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 928 out tokens · 24626 ms · 2026-05-25T18:59:05.745444+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Forward-Backward Drell-Yan Asymmetry and PDF Determination

    hep-ph 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    PDF profiling analysis based on neutral-current Drell-Yan forward-backward asymmetry at the LHC with xFitter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Vincenzo M. Vagnoni. Experimental summary: QCD session of the 54th Rencontres de Moriond (Moriond QCD 2019). In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  2. [2]

    Keri Vos

    Matteo Fael, Thomas Mannel, and K. Keri Vos. Vcb determination from inclusive b→ c decays: an alternative method. JHEP, 02:177, 2019

  3. [3]

    Manohar and Mark B

    Aneesh V. Manohar and Mark B. Wise. Heavy quark physics. Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. , 10:1–191, 2000

  4. [4]

    Search for lepton-universality violation in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays

    Roel Aaij et al. Search for lepton-universality violation in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(19):191801, 2019

  5. [5]

    On the Standard Model predictions for RK and RK∗

    Marzia Bordone, Gino Isidori, and Andrea Pattori. On the Standard Model predictions for RK and RK∗. Eur. Phys. J. , C76(8):440, 2016

  6. [6]

    What RK and Q5 can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions? 2019

    Marcel Alguer´ o, Bernat Capdevila, S´ ebastien Descotes-Genon, Pere Masjuan, and Joaquim Matias. What RK and Q5 can tell us about New Physics in b→sℓℓ transitions? 2019

  7. [7]

    Springer, and Mark B

    Benjamin Grinstein, Roxanne P. Springer, and Mark B. Wise. Effective Hamiltonian for Weak Radiative B Meson Decay. Phys. Lett. , B202:138–144, 1988

  8. [8]

    Buras, and Markus E

    Gerhard Buchalla, Andrzej J. Buras, and Markus E. Lautenbacher. Weak decays beyond leading logarithms. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 68:1125–1144, 1996

  9. [9]

    Emerging patterns of New Physics with and without Lepton Flavour Universal contributions

    Marcel Alguer´ o, Bernat Capdevila, Andreas Crivellin, S´ ebastien Descotes-Genon, Pere Masjuan, Joaquim Matias, and Javier Virto. Emerging patterns of New Physics with and without Lepton Flavour Universal contributions. 2019

  10. [10]

    Buchmuller and D

    W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler. Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation. Nucl. Phys. , B268:621–653, 1986

  11. [11]

    Jason Aebischer, Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Diego Guadagnoli, M´ eril Reboud, Peter Stangl, and David M. Straub. B-decay discrepancies after Moriond 2019. 2019

  12. [12]

    The CKM parameters in the SMEFT

    S´ ebastien Descotes-Genon, Adam Falkowski, Marco Fedele, Mart´ ın Gonz´ alez-Alonso, and Javier Virto. The CKM parameters in the SMEFT. 2018

  13. [13]

    Connecting neutral current B anomalies with the heaviness of the third family

    Joe Davighi. Connecting neutral current B anomalies with the heaviness of the third family. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  14. [14]

    B. C. Allanach and Joe Davighi. Deforming the Third Family Hypercharge Model for Neutral Current B−Anomalies. 2019

  15. [15]

    Flavour anomalies after the RK∗ measurement

    Guido D’Amico, Marco Nardecchia, Paolo Panci, Francesco Sannino, Alessandro Strumia, Riccardo Torre, and Alfredo Urbano. Flavour anomalies after the RK∗ measurement. JHEP, 09:010, 2017

  16. [16]

    D’Ambrosio, A

    G. D’Ambrosio, A. M. Iyer, F. Piccinini, and A. D. Polosa. Confronting B anomalies with atomic physics. 2019

  17. [17]

    Pati and Abdus Salam

    Jogesh C. Pati and Abdus Salam. Lepton Number as the Fourth Color. Phys. Rev. , D10:275–289, 1974. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D11,703(1975)]

  18. [18]

    Importance of Loop Effects in Explaining the Accumulated Evidence for New Physics in B Decays with a Vector Leptoquark

    Andreas Crivellin, Christoph Greub, Dario M¨ uller, and Francesco Saturnino. Importance of Loop Effects in Explaining the Accumulated Evidence for New Physics in B Decays with a Vector Leptoquark. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 122(1):011805, 2019

  19. [19]

    Explaining the Flavor Anomalies with a Vector Leptoquark (Moriond 2019 update)

    Andreas Crivellin and Francesco Saturnino. Explaining the Flavor Anomalies with a Vector Leptoquark (Moriond 2019 update). In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  20. [20]

    Impact of polarization observables andBc→ τν on new physics explanations of the b→cτν anomaly

    Monika Blanke, Andreas Crivellin, Stefan de Boer, Teppei Kitahara, Marta Moscati, Ulrich Nierste, and Ivan Niˇ sandˇ zi´ c. Impact of polarization observables andBc→ τν on new physics explanations of the b→cτν anomaly. Phys. Rev. , D99(7):075006, 2019

  21. [21]

    Addendum: ”Impact of polarization observables andBc→ τν on new physics explanations of the b→cτν anomaly”

    Monika Blanke, Andreas Crivellin, Teppei Kitahara, Marta Moscati, Ulrich Nierste, and Ivan Niˇ sandˇ zi´ c. Addendum: ”Impact of polarization observables andBc→ τν on new physics explanations of the b→cτν anomaly”. 2019

  22. [22]

    Search for New Physics Signals via Doubly Weak B Decays

    Faisal Munir Bhutta and Cai-DIan L¨ u. Search for New Physics Signals via Doubly Weak B Decays. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  23. [23]

    Tanabashi et al

    M. Tanabashi et al. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. , D98(3):030001, 2018

  24. [24]

    A global fit of the MSSM with GAMBIT

    Peter Athron et al. A global fit of the MSSM with GAMBIT. Eur. Phys. J. , C77(12):879, 2017

  25. [25]

    Exploring light supersymmetry with GAMBIT

    Anders Kvellestad. Exploring light supersymmetry with GAMBIT. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  26. [26]

    Goodsell, Sabine Kraml, Humberto Reyes-Gonz´ alez, and Sophie L

    Guillaume Chalons, Mark D. Goodsell, Sabine Kraml, Humberto Reyes-Gonz´ alez, and Sophie L. Williamson. LHC limits on gluinos and squarks in the minimal Dirac gaugino model. JHEP, 04:113, 2019

  27. [27]

    Luigi Delle Rose, Shaaban Khalil, Simon J. D. King, Suchita Kulkarni, Carlo Marzo, Stefano Moretti, and Cem S. Un. Sneutrino Dark Matter, Constraints and Perspectives. 2018

  28. [28]

    Luigi Delle Rose, Shaaban Khalil, Simon J. D. King, Suchita Kulkarni, Carlo Marzo, Stefano Moretti, and Cem S. Un. Sneutrino Dark Matter in the BLSSM. JHEP, 07:100, 2018

  29. [29]

    Cepeda et al

    M. Cepeda et al. Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC. 2019

  30. [30]

    De Blas et al

    J. De Blas et al. Higgs Boson Studies at Future Particle Colliders. 2019

  31. [31]

    Precision predictions at N 3LO for the Higgs boson rapidity distribution at the LHC

    Falko Dulat, Bernhard Mistlberger, and Andrea Pelloni. Precision predictions at N 3LO for the Higgs boson rapidity distribution at the LHC. Phys. Rev. , D99(3):034004, 2019

  32. [32]

    The transverse-momentum subtraction method at N 3LO applied to Higgs boson production at the LHC

    Leandro Cieri. The transverse-momentum subtraction method at N 3LO applied to Higgs boson production at the LHC. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  33. [33]

    Leandro Cieri, Xuan Chen, Thomas Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, and Alexander Huss. Higgs boson production at the LHC using the qT subtraction formalism at N 3LO QCD. JHEP, 02:096, 2019

  34. [34]

    Dreyer and Alexander Karlberg

    Fr´ ed´ eric A. Dreyer and Alexander Karlberg. Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Pair Production at N3LO. Phys. Rev. , D98(11):114016, 2018

  35. [35]

    Dreyer, Alexander Karlberg, Gavin P

    Matteo Cacciari, Fr´ ed´ eric A. Dreyer, Alexander Karlberg, Gavin P. Salam, and Giulia Zanderighi. Fully Differential Vector-Boson-Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next- to-Leading Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 115(8):082002, 2015. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.120,no.13,139901(2018)]

  36. [36]

    Dreyer and Alexander Karlberg

    Fr´ ed´ eric A. Dreyer and Alexander Karlberg. Fully differential Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Pair Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order. Phys. Rev. , D99(7):074028, 2019

  37. [37]

    Azzi et al

    P. Azzi et al. Standard Model Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC. 2019

  38. [38]

    Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX

    Massimiliano Grazzini, Stefan Kallweit, and Marius Wiesemann. Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX. Eur. Phys. J. , C78(7):537, 2018

  39. [39]

    In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

    Stefan Kallweit. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  40. [40]

    ZZ production at the LHC: NLO QCD corrections to the loop-induced gluon fusion channel

    Massimiliano Grazzini, Stefan Kallweit, Marius Wiesemann, and Jeong Yeon Yook. ZZ production at the LHC: NLO QCD corrections to the loop-induced gluon fusion channel. JHEP, 03:084, 2019

  41. [41]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, M. H¨ ofer, and A. Huss. Isolated photon and photon+jet production at NNLO QCD accuracy and the ratio Rγ 13/8. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019, 2019

  42. [42]

    Isolated photon and photon+jet production at NNLO QCD accuracy

    Xuan Chen, Thomas Gehrmann, Nigel Glover, Marius H¨ ofer, and Alexander Huss. Isolated photon and photon+jet production at NNLO QCD accuracy. Submitted to: J. High Energy Phys., 2019

  43. [43]

    Campbell, R

    John M. Campbell, R. Keith Ellis, and Ciaran Williams. Direct Photon Production at Next-to–Next-to-Leading Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 118(22):222001, 2017

  44. [44]

    Isolated photons in perturbative QCD

    Stefano Frixione. Isolated photons in perturbative QCD. Phys. Lett., B429:369–374, 1998

  45. [45]

    A practical guide to event generation for prompt photon production with Sherpa

    Frank Siegert. A practical guide to event generation for prompt photon production with Sherpa. J. Phys., G44(4):044007, 2017

  46. [46]

    Goncharov

    Alexander B. Goncharov. Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes. Math. Res. Lett. , 5:497–516, 1998

  47. [47]

    In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

    Johannes Henn. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  48. [48]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang, and S. Zoia. All master integrals for three-jet production at NNLO. 2018

  49. [49]

    In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

    Simone Zoia. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  50. [50]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang, and S. Zoia. Analytic result for a two-loop five-particle amplitude. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 122(12):121602, 2019

  51. [51]

    Henn, Pascal Wasser, Yang Zhang, and Simone Zoia

    Dmitry Chicherin, Thomas Gehrmann, Johannes M. Henn, Pascal Wasser, Yang Zhang, and Simone Zoia. The two-loop five-particle amplitude in N = 8 supergravity. JHEP, 03:115, 2019

  52. [52]

    Badger, D

    S. Badger, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, G. Heinrich, J. M. Henn, T. Peraro, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang, and S. Zoia. Analytic form of the full two-loop five-gluon all-plus helicity amplitude. 2019

  53. [53]

    Dixon, Enrico Herrmann, Ben Page, and Mao Zeng

    Samuel Abreu, Lance J. Dixon, Enrico Herrmann, Ben Page, and Mao Zeng. The two-loop five-point amplitude inN = 8 supergravity. JHEP, 03:123, 2019

  54. [54]

    Dixon, Enrico Herrmann, Ben Page, and Mao Zeng

    Samuel Abreu, Lance J. Dixon, Enrico Herrmann, Ben Page, and Mao Zeng. The two-loop five-point amplitude inN = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 122(12):121603, 2019

  55. [55]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page, and V. Sotnikov. Planar Two-Loop Five- Parton Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity. JHEP, 11:116, 2018

  56. [56]

    Elliptic polylogarithms and Feynman parameter integrals

    Johannes Broedel, Claude Duhr, Falko Dulat, Brenda Penante, and Lorenzo Tancredi. Elliptic polylogarithms and Feynman parameter integrals. JHEP, 05:120, 2019

  57. [57]

    Observation of t tH production

    Albert M Sirunyan et al. Observation of t tH production. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120(23):231801, 2018

  58. [58]

    Aaboud et al

    M. Aaboud et al. Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. , B784:173–191, 2018

  59. [59]

    Associated top-pair production with a heavy boson production through NLO+NNLL accuracy at the LHC

    Anna Kulesza, Leszek Motyka, Daniel Schwartl¨ ander, Tomasz Stebel, and Vincent Theeuwes. Associated top-pair production with a heavy boson production through NLO+NNLL accuracy at the LHC. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  60. [60]

    Transverse-momentum resummation for vector-boson pair production at NNLL+NNLO

    Massimiliano Grazzini, Stefan Kallweit, Dirk Rathlev, and Marius Wiesemann. Transverse-momentum resummation for vector-boson pair production at NNLL+NNLO. JHEP, 08:154, 2015

  61. [61]

    Dasgupta and G

    M. Dasgupta and G. P. Salam. Resummation of nonglobal QCD observables. Phys. Lett. , B512:323–330, 2001

  62. [62]

    Non-global logarithms in jet and isolation cone cross sections

    Marcel Balsiger, Thomas Becher, and Ding Yu Shao. Non-global logarithms in jet and isolation cone cross sections. JHEP, 08:104, 2018

  63. [63]

    Constraining the MSSM Higgs sector using precise Higgs mass predictions

    Henning Bahl. Constraining the MSSM Higgs sector using precise Higgs mass predictions. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD

  64. [64]

    La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  65. [65]

    H. Bahl, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, S. Paßehr, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein. Precision calculations in the MSSM Higgs-boson sector with FeynHiggs 2.14. 2018

  66. [66]

    Effective Field Theory after a New-Physics Discovery

    Matthias K¨ onig. Effective Field Theory after a New-Physics Discovery. In54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  67. [67]

    Effective Theory for a Heavy Scalar Coupled to the SM via Vector-Like Quarks

    Stefan Alte, Matthias K¨ onig, and Matthias Neubert. Effective Theory for a Heavy Scalar Coupled to the SM via Vector-Like Quarks. Eur. Phys. J. , C79(4):352, 2019

  68. [68]

    Measurement of the W -boson mass in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Morad Aaboud et al. Measurement of the W -boson mass in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. , C78(2):110, 2018. [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J.C78,no.11,898(2018)]

  69. [69]

    A Study of the PDF uncertainty on the LHC W-boson mass measurement

    Moh’d Hussein, Joshua Isaacson, and Joey Huston. A Study of the PDF uncertainty on the LHC W-boson mass measurement. 2019

  70. [70]

    Neutral current forward–backward asymmetry: from θW to PDF determinations

    Elena Accomando, Juri Fiaschi, Francesco Hautmann, and Stefano Moretti. Neutral current forward–backward asymmetry: from θW to PDF determinations. Eur. Phys. J. , C78(8):663, 2018

  71. [71]

    Alekhin et al

    S. Alekhin et al. HERAFitter. Eur. Phys. J. , C75(7):304, 2015

  72. [72]

    In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

    Ivan Novikov. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

  73. [73]

    Forward Drell-Yan and backward jet production as a probe of the BFKL dynamics

    Krzysztof Golec-Biernat, Leszek Motyka, and Tomasz Stebel. Forward Drell-Yan and backward jet production as a probe of the BFKL dynamics. JHEP, 12:091, 2018

  74. [74]

    Balitsky and A

    I. Balitsky and A. Tarasov. Power corrections to TMD factorization for Z-boson produc- tion. JHEP, 05:150, 2018

  75. [75]

    Foundations of perturbative QCD

    John Collins. Foundations of perturbative QCD. Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. , 32:1–624, 2011

  76. [76]

    Hautmann, H

    F. Hautmann, H. Jung, A. Lelek, V. Radescu, and R. Zlebcik. Collinear and TMD Quark and Gluon Densities from Parton Branching Solution of QCD Evolution Equations.JHEP, 01:070, 2018

  77. [77]

    Bermudez Martinez et al

    A. Bermudez Martinez et al. Production of Z-bosons in the parton branching method. 2019

  78. [78]

    Status and developments of event generators.PoS, LHCP2016:007, 2016

    Torbj¨ orn Sj¨ ostrand. Status and developments of event generators.PoS, LHCP2016:007, 2016

  79. [79]

    Koshelkin and Cheuk-Yin Wong

    Andrew V. Koshelkin and Cheuk-Yin Wong. Dynamics of Quarks in a 2D Flux Tube. EPJ Web Conf. , 90:01004, 2015

  80. [80]

    Koshelkin

    Andrew V. Koshelkin. In 54th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interac- tions (Moriond QCD 2019) La Thuile, Italy, March 23-30, 2019 , 2019

Showing first 80 references.