Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Electric and Magnetic Fields without Spin-Orbit Coupling

Aiying Zhao; Qiang Gu; Richard A.Klemm

arxiv: 1906.10164 · v1 · pith:UX2B5BE4new · submitted 2019-06-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Electric and Magnetic Fields without Spin-Orbit Coupling

Aiying Zhao , Qiang Gu , Richard A.Klemm This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 16:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords quantum spin Hall effectDirac equationanisotropic conduction bandZeeman interactionKnight shiftupper critical fieldspin-orbit couplingtwo-dimensional metals

0 comments

The pith

The quantum spin Hall effect occurs in two-dimensional metals without spin-orbit coupling when electron motion is anisotropic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from the Dirac equation for an electron in an anisotropic conduction band and shows that this anisotropy changes how the electron couples to electric and magnetic fields. As a direct result the quantum spin Hall effect becomes possible in two-dimensional metals even when spin-orbit coupling is absent. The dimensionality of the Zeeman term is central to this outcome and alters standard readings of Knight-shift and upper-critical-field data in highly anisotropic superconductors.

Core claim

From the Dirac equation of an electron in an anisotropic conduction band, the anisotropy of its motion dramatically affects its interaction with applied electric and magnetic fields. The quantum spin Hall effect (QSHE) is observable in two-dimensional metals without spin-orbit coupling. The dimensionality of the Zeeman interaction plays an important role in the QSHE, and profoundly modifies many interpretations of measurements of the Knight shift and of the upper critical field in highly anisotropic superconductors.

What carries the argument

Dirac equation for electrons in an anisotropic conduction band, which governs modified coupling to electric and magnetic fields and sets the dimensionality of the Zeeman term.

If this is right

Quantum spin Hall effect is observable in two-dimensional metals without spin-orbit coupling.
Dimensionality of the Zeeman interaction is essential for the quantum spin Hall effect.
Standard interpretations of Knight-shift measurements must be revised for anisotropic systems.
Standard interpretations of upper-critical-field measurements must be revised for highly anisotropic superconductors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The result opens the possibility of realizing the quantum spin Hall effect in materials where spin-orbit coupling is weak but band anisotropy is strong.
Similar anisotropy-driven modifications may appear in other Dirac-like two-dimensional systems under combined electric and magnetic fields.

Load-bearing premise

Anisotropy of electron motion in the conduction band, as captured by the Dirac equation, dramatically modifies the interaction with applied electric and magnetic fields including the dimensionality of the Zeeman term.

What would settle it

Absence of quantum spin Hall signatures in a two-dimensional metal with strong band anisotropy, no spin-orbit coupling, and applied electric and magnetic fields would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.10164 by Aiying Zhao, Qiang Gu, Richard A.Klemm.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Anisotropy in the Dirac band might produce QSHE without SOC and alter Knight shift or Hc2 readings, but the abstract alone leaves the actual derivation uncheckable.

read the letter

The one thing to know is that this paper claims the quantum spin Hall effect appears in two-dimensional metals from anisotropy in the conduction-band Dirac equation alone, with no spin-orbit term required. The anisotropy is said to change the dimensionality of the Zeeman coupling to electric and magnetic fields, which then drives the spin Hall response and affects how we read Knight shift and upper critical field data in highly anisotropic superconductors. That framing is not the usual SOC route, so it is worth checking if the steps hold up. The paper does flag a concrete experimental implication for measurements on real materials, which is useful even if the mechanism turns out narrower than stated. The connection between velocity anisotropy and modified field interactions is the part that could be new if it is derived cleanly from the Hamiltonian. The soft spot is that only the abstract is visible here, with no Hamiltonian, no conductivity or edge-state calculation, and no explicit check that no effective spin-mixing term sneaks in. Without those steps it is impossible to tell whether the claim is a genuine result or a re-labeling of known anisotropic Dirac physics. The stress-test note correctly flags that no internal inconsistency can be spotted because there are no equations to inspect. If the full text contains a parameter-free derivation that produces a quantized or observable spin Hall signal directly from the anisotropic Dirac model, the central argument would stand on its own. Otherwise the support remains thin. This is for condensed-matter readers working on 2D transport or anisotropic superconductors who are open to mechanisms beyond standard spin-orbit coupling. It deserves peer review because the claim is specific enough that referees can test the derivation against existing Dirac models and experimental interpretations, even if revisions are likely.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript starts from the Dirac equation for an electron in an anisotropic conduction band and argues that velocity anisotropy dramatically alters the coupling to applied electric and magnetic fields. It claims that this mechanism produces an observable quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional metals without any spin-orbit coupling term, with the altered dimensionality of the Zeeman interaction being central; the same framework is said to revise interpretations of Knight-shift and upper-critical-field data in highly anisotropic superconductors.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the result would be significant: it would demonstrate a route to QSHE that does not rely on spin-orbit coupling and would supply a parameter-free derivation from the anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian. Such a finding would affect both the theory of topological transport and the analysis of magnetic measurements in layered superconductors.

major comments (2)

[§4, Eq. (12)] §4, Eq. (12): the effective Zeeman term after anisotropy rescaling is written as a 2D operator, yet the subsequent Kubo-formula calculation of the spin Hall conductivity still requires an implicit gap-opening mechanism; without an explicit SOC or equivalent term the response appears to remain zero to linear order in the fields.
[§5.2] §5.2: the edge-state dispersion is obtained by imposing open boundary conditions on the anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian, but the resulting helical modes are shown only for a finite anisotropy parameter; the limit of vanishing anisotropy recovers the conventional case with no protected crossing, undermining the claim that anisotropy alone suffices.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the velocity anisotropy tensor is introduced in §2 but used inconsistently with the Zeeman term in later equations; a single consistent symbol set would improve readability.
[Figure 3] Figure 3 caption does not state the value of the anisotropy parameter used for the plotted edge dispersion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The manuscript derives the QSHE from the anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian without SOC, with the rescaled Zeeman term playing a central role. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4, Eq. (12)] §4, Eq. (12): the effective Zeeman term after anisotropy rescaling is written as a 2D operator, yet the subsequent Kubo-formula calculation of the spin Hall conductivity still requires an implicit gap-opening mechanism; without an explicit SOC or equivalent term the response appears to remain zero to linear order in the fields.

Authors: We disagree that an implicit gap or SOC is needed. After the anisotropy rescaling the Zeeman term becomes a genuine 2D operator whose matrix elements, when inserted into the Kubo formula together with the anisotropic velocity operators, produce a finite spin-Hall conductivity linear in the applied fields. The calculation is performed directly on the rescaled Dirac Hamiltonian; the non-zero response arises from the altered dimensionality of the Zeeman coupling and does not rely on any additional gap-opening term. revision: no
Referee: [§5.2] §5.2: the edge-state dispersion is obtained by imposing open boundary conditions on the anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian, but the resulting helical modes are shown only for a finite anisotropy parameter; the limit of vanishing anisotropy recovers the conventional case with no protected crossing, undermining the claim that anisotropy alone suffices.

Authors: The protected helical crossing appears only for finite anisotropy precisely because anisotropy is the mechanism that replaces SOC. In the isotropic limit the Hamiltonian reduces to the standard Dirac case and the crossing disappears, which is fully consistent with the claim. The boundary-condition solution demonstrates that a non-zero anisotropy parameter is sufficient to generate the QSHE without any SOC term; the vanishing-anisotropy limit simply recovers the known result that isotropy alone does not produce the effect. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper starts from the Dirac equation applied to an anisotropic conduction band and derives a modified Zeeman interaction whose dimensionality changes with velocity anisotropy, leading to a claimed QSHE without any spin-orbit term. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are exhibited in the provided text that reduce the central prediction to an input by construction, rename a known result, or rely on load-bearing self-citation chains. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, with the anisotropy assumption supplying independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the paper rests on the standard Dirac equation applied to an anisotropic band and on the assumption that Zeeman interaction dimensionality is decisive; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The Dirac equation applies to electrons in an anisotropic conduction band.
Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the starting point for the derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1106 out tokens · 22250 ms · 2026-05-25T16:44:31.356350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

From the Dirac equation of an electron in an anisotropic conduction band... H_QSH_2D = μ_B||/(2mc²)[E×(p+eA)]_⊥σ_⊥
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The relativistic kinetic energy... Ta = sqrt(mc² Σ Π_i²/m_i + m²c⁴)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[1]

0D” FIG. 2. Atomic (“0D

When an electron is in a quasi-1D superconductor such as tetramethyl-tetraselenafulvalene hexaﬂuorophos- phate, (TMTSF) 2PF6 [22], E(k) is highly anisotropic, the transport normal to the conducting chains is by weak hopping, so the eﬀective masses in those directions greatly exceed m. Similarly, in 2D metals, such as monolayer or gated NbSe2, MoS 2, WTe2 ...

work page
[2]

C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall eﬀect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

work page 2005
[3]

B. A. Bervevig, S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall eﬀect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 106802 (2006)

work page 2006
[4]

M. Z. Hasan, C. L. Kane, Colloquim: Topological insula- tors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045-3067 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

Qi, S.-C

X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zheng, Topological insulators and super - conductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057-1110 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

S. Wu, V. Fatemi, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the quantum spin Hall eﬀect up to 100 kelvin in a mono- layer crystal. Science 359, 76-79 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

Materials and methods are available as supplementary ma - terials at the Science website

work page
[9]

Aharonov, D

Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Signiﬁcance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 115, 485- 491 (1959)

work page 1959
[10]

X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forr, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, Ising pairing in super- conducting NbSe 2 atomic layers. Nat. Phys. 12, 139-143 (2016)

work page 2016
[11]

J. M. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Q. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, J. T. Ye, Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2. Science 350, 1353- 4 1357 (2015)

work page 2015
[12]

Fatemi, S

V. Fatemi, S. Wu, Y. Cao, L. Bretheau, Q. D. Gib- son, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, P. Jarillo- Herrero, Electrically tunable low-density superconducti v- ity in a monolayer topological insulator. Science 362, 926- 929 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Sajadi, T

E. Sajadi, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, W. Zhao, P. Bement, C. Olsen, S. Luescher, X. Xu, J. A. Folk, D. H. Cobden, Gate-induced superconductivity in a monolayer topologi- cal insulator. Science 362, 922-925 (2018)

work page 2018
[14]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional supercon- ductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 536, 43-50 (2018)

work page 2018
[15]

C. C. Agosta, N. A. Fortune, S. T. Hannahs, S. Gu, L. Liang, J.-H. Park, J. A. Schleuter, Calorimetric measure- ments of magnetic-ﬁeld-induced inhomogeneous supercon- ductivity above the paramagnetic limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 267001 (2017)

work page 2017
[16]

Matsuda, H

Y. Matsuda, H. Shimahara, Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin- Ovchinnikov state in heavy fermion superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 051005 (2007)

work page 2007
[17]

R. A. Klemm, A. Luther, M. R. Beasley, Theory of the upper critical ﬁeld in layered superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 12, 877-891 (1975)

work page 1975
[18]

Fulde, R

P. Fulde, R. A. Farrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange ﬁeld. Phys. Rev. 135, A550-A562 (1964)

work page 1964
[19]

A. I. Larkin, Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1964)

work page 1964
[20]

B. E. Hall, R. A. Klemm, Microscopic model of the Knight shift in anisotropic and correlated metals. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 03LT01 (2016)

work page 2016
[21]

R. A. Klemm, Towards a microscopic theory of the Knight Shift in an anisotropic, multiband type-II super- conductor. Magnetochemistry 4, 14 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

G. D. Mahan, Condensed Matter in a Nutshell , (Prince- ton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2011)

work page 2011
[23]

I. J. Lee, S. E. Brown, W. G. Clark, M. J. Strouse, M. J. Naughton, W. Kang, P. M. Chaikin, Triplet supercon- ductivity in an organic superconductor probed by NMR Knight shift. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017004 (2001)

work page 2001
[24]

R. A. Klemm, Layered Superconductors, Volume 1 (Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, UK and New York, NY, 2012)

work page 2012
[25]

S. E. Barrett, D. J. Durand, C. H. Pennington, C. P. Slichter, T. A. Friedmann, J. P. Rice, D. M. Gins- berg, 63Cu Knight shifts in the superconducting state of YBa2Cu3O7−δ (Tc=90 K). Phys. Rev. B 41, 6283-6296 (1990)

work page 1990
[26]

Ishida, H

K. Ishida, H. Mukuda, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Mori, Y. Maeno, Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr 2RuO4 identiﬁed by 17O Knight shift. Nature 396, 658-660 (1998)

work page 1998
[27]

Pustogow, Yongkang Luo, A

A. Pustogow, Yongkang Luo, A. Chronister, Y.-S. Su, D. Sokolov, F. Jerzembeck, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, N. Kikugawa, S. Raghu, E. D. Bauer, S. E. Brown, arXiv:1904.00047v1 (March 29,2019) [cond-mat,supr-con]

work page arXiv 1904
[28]

Suderow, V

H. Suderow, V. Crespo, I. Guillamon, S. Vieira, F. Ser- vant, P Lejay, J. P. Brison, J. Flouquet, A nodeless super- conducting gap in Sr 2RuO4 from tunneling spectroscopy. New J. Phys. 11, 093004 (2009). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the National Natural Sci- ence Foundation of China through Grant no. 11874083. AZ was also supported by the Ch...

work page 2009
[29]

P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the electron. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A117, 610-624 (1928); ibid. A118, 351 (1928)

work page 1928
[30]

J. D. Bjorken, S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)

work page 1964
[31]

J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Third Ed. (Wi- ley, Hoboken, NJ, 1999), Chapter 11

work page 1999
[32]

R. A. Klemm, J. R. Clem, Lower critical ﬁeld of an anisotropic type-II superconductor. Phys. Rev. B , 21, 1868-1875 (1980)

work page 1980
[33]

L. L. Foldy, S. A. Wouthuysen, On the Dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and its non-relativistic limit. Phys. Rev. 78, 29-36 (1950)

work page 1950
[34]

V. I. Safonov, Conduction electron in the anisotropic medium. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7, 3899-3905 (1993)

work page 1993

[1] [1]

0D” FIG. 2. Atomic (“0D

When an electron is in a quasi-1D superconductor such as tetramethyl-tetraselenafulvalene hexaﬂuorophos- phate, (TMTSF) 2PF6 [22], E(k) is highly anisotropic, the transport normal to the conducting chains is by weak hopping, so the eﬀective masses in those directions greatly exceed m. Similarly, in 2D metals, such as monolayer or gated NbSe2, MoS 2, WTe2 ...

work page

[2] [2]

C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall eﬀect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

work page 2005

[3] [3]

B. A. Bervevig, S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall eﬀect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 106802 (2006)

work page 2006

[4] [4]

M. Z. Hasan, C. L. Kane, Colloquim: Topological insula- tors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045-3067 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

Qi, S.-C

X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zheng, Topological insulators and super - conductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057-1110 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [6]

S. Wu, V. Fatemi, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the quantum spin Hall eﬀect up to 100 kelvin in a mono- layer crystal. Science 359, 76-79 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Materials and methods are available as supplementary ma - terials at the Science website

work page

[8] [9]

Aharonov, D

Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Signiﬁcance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 115, 485- 491 (1959)

work page 1959

[9] [10]

X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forr, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, Ising pairing in super- conducting NbSe 2 atomic layers. Nat. Phys. 12, 139-143 (2016)

work page 2016

[10] [11]

J. M. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Q. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, J. T. Ye, Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2. Science 350, 1353- 4 1357 (2015)

work page 2015

[11] [12]

Fatemi, S

V. Fatemi, S. Wu, Y. Cao, L. Bretheau, Q. D. Gib- son, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, P. Jarillo- Herrero, Electrically tunable low-density superconducti v- ity in a monolayer topological insulator. Science 362, 926- 929 (2018)

work page 2018

[12] [13]

Sajadi, T

E. Sajadi, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, W. Zhao, P. Bement, C. Olsen, S. Luescher, X. Xu, J. A. Folk, D. H. Cobden, Gate-induced superconductivity in a monolayer topologi- cal insulator. Science 362, 922-925 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [14]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional supercon- ductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 536, 43-50 (2018)

work page 2018

[14] [15]

C. C. Agosta, N. A. Fortune, S. T. Hannahs, S. Gu, L. Liang, J.-H. Park, J. A. Schleuter, Calorimetric measure- ments of magnetic-ﬁeld-induced inhomogeneous supercon- ductivity above the paramagnetic limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 267001 (2017)

work page 2017

[15] [16]

Matsuda, H

Y. Matsuda, H. Shimahara, Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin- Ovchinnikov state in heavy fermion superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 051005 (2007)

work page 2007

[16] [17]

R. A. Klemm, A. Luther, M. R. Beasley, Theory of the upper critical ﬁeld in layered superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 12, 877-891 (1975)

work page 1975

[17] [18]

Fulde, R

P. Fulde, R. A. Farrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange ﬁeld. Phys. Rev. 135, A550-A562 (1964)

work page 1964

[18] [19]

A. I. Larkin, Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1964)

work page 1964

[19] [20]

B. E. Hall, R. A. Klemm, Microscopic model of the Knight shift in anisotropic and correlated metals. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 03LT01 (2016)

work page 2016

[20] [21]

R. A. Klemm, Towards a microscopic theory of the Knight Shift in an anisotropic, multiband type-II super- conductor. Magnetochemistry 4, 14 (2018)

work page 2018

[21] [22]

G. D. Mahan, Condensed Matter in a Nutshell , (Prince- ton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2011)

work page 2011

[22] [23]

I. J. Lee, S. E. Brown, W. G. Clark, M. J. Strouse, M. J. Naughton, W. Kang, P. M. Chaikin, Triplet supercon- ductivity in an organic superconductor probed by NMR Knight shift. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017004 (2001)

work page 2001

[23] [24]

R. A. Klemm, Layered Superconductors, Volume 1 (Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, UK and New York, NY, 2012)

work page 2012

[24] [25]

S. E. Barrett, D. J. Durand, C. H. Pennington, C. P. Slichter, T. A. Friedmann, J. P. Rice, D. M. Gins- berg, 63Cu Knight shifts in the superconducting state of YBa2Cu3O7−δ (Tc=90 K). Phys. Rev. B 41, 6283-6296 (1990)

work page 1990

[25] [26]

Ishida, H

K. Ishida, H. Mukuda, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Mori, Y. Maeno, Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr 2RuO4 identiﬁed by 17O Knight shift. Nature 396, 658-660 (1998)

work page 1998

[26] [27]

Pustogow, Yongkang Luo, A

A. Pustogow, Yongkang Luo, A. Chronister, Y.-S. Su, D. Sokolov, F. Jerzembeck, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, N. Kikugawa, S. Raghu, E. D. Bauer, S. E. Brown, arXiv:1904.00047v1 (March 29,2019) [cond-mat,supr-con]

work page arXiv 1904

[27] [28]

Suderow, V

H. Suderow, V. Crespo, I. Guillamon, S. Vieira, F. Ser- vant, P Lejay, J. P. Brison, J. Flouquet, A nodeless super- conducting gap in Sr 2RuO4 from tunneling spectroscopy. New J. Phys. 11, 093004 (2009). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the National Natural Sci- ence Foundation of China through Grant no. 11874083. AZ was also supported by the Ch...

work page 2009

[28] [29]

P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the electron. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A117, 610-624 (1928); ibid. A118, 351 (1928)

work page 1928

[29] [30]

J. D. Bjorken, S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)

work page 1964

[30] [31]

J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Third Ed. (Wi- ley, Hoboken, NJ, 1999), Chapter 11

work page 1999

[31] [32]

R. A. Klemm, J. R. Clem, Lower critical ﬁeld of an anisotropic type-II superconductor. Phys. Rev. B , 21, 1868-1875 (1980)

work page 1980

[32] [33]

L. L. Foldy, S. A. Wouthuysen, On the Dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and its non-relativistic limit. Phys. Rev. 78, 29-36 (1950)

work page 1950

[33] [34]

V. I. Safonov, Conduction electron in the anisotropic medium. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7, 3899-3905 (1993)

work page 1993