Pith. sign in

REVIEW

New Results for the Complexity of Resilience for Binary Conjunctive Queries with Self-Joins

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.01129 v2 pith:CA6QVVAH submitted 2019-07-02 cs.DB cs.CC

New Results for the Complexity of Resilience for Binary Conjunctive Queries with Self-Joins

classification cs.DB cs.CC
keywords conjunctiveproblemqueriesresilienceresultsself-joinsgivebinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The resilience of a Boolean query is the minimum number of tuples that need to be deleted from the input tables in order to make the query false. A solution to this problem immediately translates into a solution for the more widely known problem of deletion propagation with source-side effects. In this paper, we give several novel results on the hardness of the resilience problem for $\textit{binary conjunctive queries with self-joins}$ (i.e. conjunctive queries with relations of maximal arity 2) with one repeated relation. Unlike in the self-join free case, the concept of triad is not enough to fully characterize the complexity of resilience. We identify new structural properties, namely chains, confluences and permutations, which lead to various $NP$-hardness results. We also give novel involved reductions to network flow to show certain cases are in $P$. Overall, we give a dichotomy result for the restricted setting when one relation is repeated at most 2 times, and we cover many of the cases for 3. Although restricted, our results provide important insights into the problem of self-joins that we hope can help solve the general case of all conjunctive queries with self-joins in the future.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.